Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Lime Manufacturing Plants Technology Review".

Contacts in opposition to legislative or executive actions that seek to add to the U.S. Constitution the language of the "Equal Rights Amendment" that originally was submitted to the states by the 92nd Congress as H.J. Res. 208 on March 22,1972, which failed ratification effective March 22, 1979. These include: -- opposition to S.J. Res. 4 (Cardin) and H.J. Res. 25 (Pressley), resolutions purporting by multiple unconstitutional mechanisms to retroactively nullify the seven-year ratification deadline that was included in the Proposing Clause of H.J. Res. 208 of the 92nd Congress, and to declare the long-expired 1972 Equal Rights Amendment to be part of the U.S. Constitution. (Cloture failed on motion to proceed to S. J. Res. 4, 51-47, on April 27, 2023.) -- opposition to signing of House Discharge Petition No. 6 (Pressley), filed July 18, 2023, seeking discharge of H.J. Res. 25. -- opposition to S.J. Res. 39 (Gillibrand) and H.J. Res. 82 (Bush), expressing the non-binding "sense of Congress" that the Equal Rights Amendment has been ratified and that the Archivist "should" publish/certify it. -- opposition to any actions by any component of the Executive Branch that would seek to evade or ignore the insurmountable constitutional obstacles and court decisions barring resuscitation of the 1972 Equal Rights Amendment, including but not limited to opposition to schemes by certain members of Congress and others to pressure the Archivist of the United States to certify the ERA in contravention of multiple federal court rulings. -- support for Senate Resolution 107 (Hyde-Smith), expressing the sense of the Senate that Congress lacks power to act on a constitutional amendment resolution after submitting it to the states, or to revive an expired amendment proposal.

Client expense: $60,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Contacts in opposition to legislative or executive actions that seek to add to the U.S. Constitution the language of the "Equal Rights Amendment" that originally was submitted to the states by the 92nd Congress as H.J. Res. 208 on March 22,1972, which failed ratification effective March 22, 1979. These include: -- opposition to S.J. Res. 4 (Cardin) and H.J. Res. 25 (Pressley), resolutions purporting by multiple unconstitutional mechanisms to retroactively nullify the seven-year ratification deadline that was included in the Proposing Clause of H.J. Res. 208 of the 92nd Congress, and to declare the long-expired 1972 Equal Rights Amendment to be part of the U.S. Constitution. (Cloture failed on motion to proceed to S. J. Res. 4, 51-47, on April 27, 2023.) -- opposition to signing of House Discharge Petition No. 6 (Pressley), filed July 18, 2023, seeking discharge of H.J. Res. 25. -- opposition to any actions by any component of the Executive Branch that would seek to evade or ignore the insurmountable constitutional obstacles and court decisions barring resuscitation of the 1972 Equal Rights Amendment, including but not limited to opposition to schemes by certain members of Congress and others to pressure the Archivist of the United States to certify the ERA in contravention of multiple federal court rulings. -- support for Senate Resolution 107 (Hyde-Smith), expressing the sense of the Senate that Congress lacks power to act on a constitutional amendment resolution after submitting it to the states, or to revive an expired amendment proposal.

Client expense: $70,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Contacts in opposition to legislative or executive actions that seek to add to the U.S. Constitution the language of the "Equal Rights Amendment" that originally was submitted to the states by the 92nd Congress as H.J. Res. 208 on March 22,1972, which failed ratification effective March 22, 1979. These include: -- opposition to S.J. Res. 4 (Cardin) and H.J. Res. 25 (Pressley), resolutions purporting by multiple unconstitutional mechanisms to retroactively nullify the seven-year ratification deadline that was included in the Proposing Clause of H.J. Res. 208 of the 92nd Congress, and to declare the long-expired 1972 Equal Rights Amendment to be part of the U.S. Constitution. (Cloture failed on motion to proceed to S. J. Res. 4, 51-47, on April 27, 2023.) -- opposition to any actions by any component of the Executive Branch that would seek to evade or ignore the insurmountable constitutional obstacles and court decisions barring resuscitation of the 1972 Equal Rights Amendment, including but not limited to opposition to schemes by certain members of Congress and others to pressure the Archivist of the United States to certify the ERA in contravention of federal court rulings. -- support for Senate Resolution 107 (Hyde-Smith), expressing the sense of the Senate that Congress lacks power to act on a constitutional amendment resolution after submitting it to the states, or to revive an expired amendment proposal. Contacts of advisory and informational nature regarding the nomination of Colleen Shogan, Ph.D., as Archivist of the United States (PN 68), with respect to the status of the Equal Rights Amendment, and relating to the handling of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests by the National Archives and Records Administration. No position taken on confirmation. Shogan confirmed 52-45 on May 10, 2023.

Client expense: $80,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE