Arkansas Valley Conduit Act
Legislative Progress
Momentum (last 30 days)
0
score
0 actions · 0 new cosponsors · 0 votes
Speed vs cohort
72pct
34d open
vs 7,255 other HR bills in the 110th — cohort avg 47d
No CRS summary is available for this bill yet. The source title, actions, sponsors, and text versions below come from Congress.gov.
These links require the bill number to appear in the filing's source-reported specific issue text. Client expenses and lobbying-firm income are separate disclosure fields.
Filing registrants (2)
2008 · second_quarter · Natural Resources
S. 134, H.R. 186, H.R. 187, supporting bills authorizing the construction of the Arkansas Valley Conduit to provide safe drinking water for communities east of Puebli, Colorado to the state line;monitoring S. 1258 and H.R. 1662 regarding allocation of security costs for federal reclamation facilities; monitoring any activity on H.R. 1833 and H.R. 2277 regarding studies and possible enlargement of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $24,000
Bills with similar content found using semantic analysis.
Sources: Congress.gov
Government targets: Bureau of Reclamation, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2008 · second_quarter · Clean Air and Water (quality)
S. 134, H.R. 186 and S. 317 to authrozie the construction of the Arkansas Valley Conduit; also monitoring H.R. 2421 regarding changing definitions in the Clean Water Act
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $24,000
Government targets: Bureau of Reclamation, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2008 · first_quarter · Clean Air and Water (quality)
Supporting safe, clean water as indicated in H.R. 186 as well as in the Water for the Poor Act, including funding for the Water for Poor Act.
Client expense: $600,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Commerce, Dept of (DOC), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), SENATE, State, Dept of (DOS), U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
2008 · first_quarter · Clean Air and Water (quality)
S. 134, H.R. 186, S. 317 to authorize the construction of the Arkansas Valley conduit; monitoring bills which would change the Clean Water Act and particularly its definitions
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $18,000
Government targets: Bureau of Reclamation, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2008 · first_quarter · Natural Resources
S. 134, H.R. 186, H.R. 317; supporting bills authorizing the construction of Arkansas Valley Conduit to provide safe drinking water for communities east of Pueblo, Colorado to the state line; monitoring S. 1258 and H.R. 1662 regarding allocation of security costs for federal reclamation facilities; monitoring any activity on H.R. 1833 and H.R. 2277 regarding studies and possible enlargement of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $18,000
Government targets: Bureau of Reclamation, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2007 · year_end · Clean Air and Water (quality)
S. 134, H.R. 186, H.R. 317 to authorize the construction of the Arkansas Valley Conduit monitoring any bills enhancing federal support for clean water infrastructure S. 1248, H.R. 1495, Water Resources Development Act, seeking to include provisions for assistance with the Arkansas Valley Conduit, monitoring any bills changing the Clean Water Act
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $40,000
Government targets: Bureau of Reclamation, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Office of Management & Budget (OMB), SENATE
2007 · mid_year · Clean Air and Water (quality)
S. 134, H.R. 186, H.R. 317 To authorize the construction of the Arkansas Valley Conduit Monitoring any bills enhancing federal support for clean water infrastructure S. 1248, H.R. 1495, Water Resources Development Act, seeking to include provisions for assistance with the Arkansas Valley Conduit
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $60,000
Government targets: Bureau of Reclamation, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE