vs 6,662 other HR bills in the 112th — cohort avg 39d
Summary
No CRS summary is available for this bill yet. The source title, actions, sponsors, and text versions below come from Congress.gov.
Lobbying filings that explicitly cite this bill (14)
These links require the bill number to appear in the filing's source-reported specific issue text. Client expenses and lobbying-firm income are separate disclosure fields.
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
S 3240 - To empower States with programmatic flexibility and predictability to administer a supplemental nutrition assistance block grant program under which, at the request of a State agency, eligible households within the State may receive an adequate, or more nutritious, diet.
HR 1167 - Welfare Reform Act S 1904 - Welfare Reform Act
Client expense: $40,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
HR 421 - Full Faith and Credit Act
HR 1167 - Welfare Reform Act of 2011
HJ Res 1 - Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States
HJ Res 56 - Proposing a balance budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States HJ Res 79 Continuing Appropriations Resolution
S 627 Agreeing to Senate Budget Control Act of 2011
HR 2560 Cut, Cap, and Balance Act
HR 1167 Welfare Reform Act of 2011
HR 2608 Continuing Appropriations Act
HR 2693 Budget Control Act
HR 2560 Cut, Cap and Balance Act
HR 3043 To Amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985
Debt Limit
Budget Process Reform
Entitlement Reform
Client expense: $40,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Federal Communications Commission (FCC), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, President of the U.S., SENATE, State, Dept of (DOS), Treasury, Dept of
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
HR 421 - Full Faith and Credit Act
HR 1473 - Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011
HR 1167 - Welfare Reform Act of 2011
HR 1363 - H.R. 1363, making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011, and for other purposes; and waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules
HJ Res 1 - Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States
HJ Res 56 - Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to balancing the budget.
HR 2112 - Chaffetz Amendment to 2012 Agriculture Appropriations Bill, This amendment specifically eliminates the Food for Peace program, and halves the funding for four duplicative services for USDA.
H.Con.Res. 34 - Establishing the budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2012 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2013 through 2021
H.Con.Res. 34 Garrett Amendment - RSC Budget - Establishing the budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2012 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2013 through 2021
HR 2434 Financial Services
HR 2112 Agriculture Appropriations
Flake Amendment - reduce the adjusted gross income (AGI) limit for receiving farm payments to $250,000, regardless of whether it comes from on-farm or off-farm sources.
Chaffetz Amendment - cut an additional 10.4% - $1.8 billion - from H.R.2112, the Fiscal Year 2012 Agriculture Appropriations Bill. This amendment specifically eliminates the Food for Peace program, and halves the funding for four duplicative services for
H.R.1540, the Fiscal Year 2012 Defense Authorization.
Amendment No. 171 Lee/Stark
H.R. 2219 Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2012
H.R.2017: the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act
H.Amdt. 349 by Rep. LaTourette [R-OH14]
USDA.
Debt Limit
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
HR 421 Full Faith and Credit Act
HR 408 Spending Reduction Act of 2011
HJ Res 5 Spending Limit Amendment
HJ Res 44 Further Continuing Appropriations Amendments, 2011
HR 1473 Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011
HR 1 Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 HR 909 Road map for Americas Energy Future
HR 1167 Welfare Reform Act of 2011
Balanced Budget Amendment
Amendments to HR 1
RSC Jordan Amendment - #104 to cut an additional $20 billion
Obamacare amendments all of them
Amendment No. 84Rep. Pompeo (R-KS): The amendment would reduce funding for the EPA and Environmental Programs and Management by $8.4 million and increase funding for spending reduction account by $8.4 million. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
Amendment No. 149Rep. Luetkemeyer (R-MO): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available in this Act from being used for contributions to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Amendment No. 165Rep. Carter (R-TX): The amendment would prohibit the use of funds made available by this Act to be used to implement, administer, or enforce the rule entitled national Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants published by the EPA.
Amendment No. 198Rep. Poe (R-TX): The amendment would prohibit the use of funds made available by this Act to be used by the EPA to implement, administer, or enforce (1) a cap and trade program; or (2) and requirements pertaining to the emissions of green house gases.
Amendment No. 201Rep. Labrador (R-ID): The amendment would prohibit any funding under the bill from being used by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to finalize the proposed rule entitled, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters published by the EPA on June 4, 2010; or to implement or enforce any finalized version of this rule.
Amendment No. 202Rep. Labrador (R-ID): The amendment would prohibit any funding under the bill from being made available to the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). According to the White House, the CEQ coordinates Federal environmental efforts and works closely with agencies and other White House offices in the development of environmental policies and initiatives. CEQ was established within the Executive Office of the President by Congress as part of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and additional responsibilities were provided by the Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970.Amendment No. 251Rep. Scalise (R-LA): The amendment would prohibit the funds made available by this Act from further delaying the approval of any exploration plan, development operation coordination document, development production plan, application for permit to drill, or application to sidetrack for purposes of Outer Continental Shelf energy explorationAmendment No. 27Rep. Markey (D-MA): The amendment would prohibit any of the funds made available by this Act from being used to issue any new lease that authorizes the production of oil or natural gas under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to any lessee under any existing lease issued by the Department of the Interior pursuant to the Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act where such existing lease is not subject to limitations on royalty relief based on market prices.Amendment No. 65Rep. Polis (D-CO): The amendment would allow any funds made available by this Act to be used for expenditures that the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency determines to be necessary to protect the public health or prevent severe environmental degradation after climate change.
Amendment No. 66Rep. Polis (D-CO): The amendment would allow any funds made available by this Act to be used for expenditures that the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency determines to be necessary to protect the public health or prevent severe environmental degradation after Clean Air Act.
Amendment No. 90Rep. Heller (R-NV): Yucca Mountain Amendment No. 91Rep. Heller (R-NV): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available in this Act from being used by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to conduct adjudicatory functions, technical review, or support activities associated with the Yucca Mountain geologic repository license application.
Amendment No. 174Rep. Heller (R-NV): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available by this Act from being used for the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository.
Amendment No. 234Rep. Kucinich (D-OH): The amendment would increase commitments to loan guarantees under the Department of Energy, Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Authority Loan Program by $26 million.
Amendment No. 9Rep. Stearns (R-FL): The amendment would restrict funds made available by this Act from being used to implement the Report and Order of the Federal Communication Commission relating to the matter of preserving the open Internet and broadband industry practices.
Amendment No. 25Rep. Graves (R-GA): The amendment would prohibit any of the funds made available by this Act from being used to implement or enforce the Report and Order of the Federal Communications Commission relating to the matter of preserving the open Internet and broadband industry practices (FCC 10-201).
Amendment No. 34Rep. Garret (R-NJ): The amendment reduces funding for the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities, National Endowment for the Arts, Grants and Administration by $145, eliminating funding for the account. The funds would be transferred into the spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
Amendment No. 35Rep. Garrett (R-NJ): The amendment reduces funding for the Institute of Museum and Library Services by $265.8 million, eliminating funding for the account. The funds would be transferred into the spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
Amendment No. 73Rep. Royce (R-CA): The amendment would reduce by $10.7 million the amount made available to Related Programs, East-West Center. The amendment would also increase by $10.7 million the State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Spending Reduction Account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
Amendment No. 77 Rep. Royce (R-CA): The amendment would limit the amount made available to the General Services Administration for the acquisition of new vehicles for the federal fleet, with a baseline for fiscal year 2012 and each fiscal year thereafter at 80 percent of the amount made available for fiscal year 2011.
Amendment No. 80Rep. Gardner (R-CO): The amendment would prevent the use of funds made available by this Act from being used to first-class or business-class airfare for federal employees for domestic travel.
Amendment No. 81Rep. Gardner (R-CO): The amendment would reduce by 50 percent the amount of funds made available by this Act to pay for expenses for official travel.
Amendment No. 196Rep. Walberg (R-MI): The amendment would reduce funding for National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities, National Endowment for the Arts, Grants and Administration by $20,594,000. The funds, $20,594,000 would be transferred into the spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
Amendment No. 248Rep. Canseco (R-TX): The amendment would reduce funding for the East West Center Amendment No. 249Rep. Canseco (R-TX): The amendment would reduce funding for National Capital Arts and Cultural Affairs by $4,500,000. The funds would be transferred to the spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
Amendment No. 250Rep. Canseco (R-TX): The amendment would reduce by $12,510,000 National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities, National Endowment for the Humanities, Grants and Administration. The amendment would also increase by $12,510,000 the amount made available to the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Spending Reduction Account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
Amendment No. 256Rep. Huelskamp (R-KS): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available by this Act from being used to pay the travel expenses of any employee of the U.S. federal government who travels using a first-class ticket.
Amendment No. 264Rep. Broun (R-GA): The amendment would prohibit funds from being used for vacant federal properties.
Amendment No. 371Rep. Flake (R-AZ): The amendment would reduce funding for payments under the Community Service Block Grant Act by $100 million, from $405 million to $305 million. The savings would be transferred to the spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
Amendment No. 380Reps. Tom Reed (R-NY), and Tom Graves (R-GA): The amendment would eliminate funding for the Bilateral Economic Assistance, Funds Appropriate to the President, Democracy Fund, appropriated at $112,800,000 and would transfer the savings to the Spending Reduction Account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
Amendment No. 120Rep. Gohmert (R-TX): The amendment would prohibit any assistance made available by this Act from being provided to a country that opposed the position of the United States in the United Nations, subject to exemptions by the Secretary of State or the President, with opposed the position of the United States defined as a member country voting with the U.S. less than 50 percent of the time in the most recent session of the General Assembly.
Amendment No. 227Rep. Goodlatte (R-VA): The amendment would reduce by $5,000,000 the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, State and Local Programs. The amendment would also increase by $5,000,000 the amount made available to the Homeland Security Spending Reduction Account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill
Amendment No. 42Rep. Sessions (R-TX): The amendment would prohibit funds made available by the bill to be used to implement any policy, directive, administrative regulation, circular, or action to convert from private sector to public sector performance any functions or positions that are not inherently governmental in nature.
Amendment No. 46Rep. Polis (D-CO): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available by the bill from being used to maintain an end strength level of members of the Armed Forces of the United States assigned to permanent duty in Europe in excess of 35,000 members and end strength levels for active duty members of the Army, Navy, and Air Force of 565,275, 328,250, and 329,275, respectively. Amendment No. 161Rep. Quigley (-IL): The amendment would reduce funding for the Navys Air Craft Procurement by $1,083,333,333.33 and the Air Forces Air Craft Procurement by $216,666,666.67. The funds, $1,300,000,000 would be transferred into the Defense spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
Amendment No. 162Rep. Quigley (-IL): The amendment would reduce funding the expenses for the Armys research, development, test and evaluation by $971,099,800, the expenses for the Navys research, development, test and evaluation by $1,796,130,300, the expenses for the Air Forces research, development, test and evaluation by $2,674,240,500 and the expenses for the Department of Defense by $2,079,741,210. The funds, $7,521,211,800, would be transferred into the Defense spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
Amendment No. 168Rep. Larson (-CT): The amendment would reduce funding the expenses for the Navys research, development, test and evaluation by $225,000,000 and the expenses for the Air Forces research, development, test and evaluation by $225,000,000. The funds, $450,000,000 would be transferred into the Defense spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
Amendment No. 189Rep. Woolsey (D-CA): The amendment would prohibit funding under the bill for Expeditionary Fighting Vehicles, and the V-22 Osprey aircraft.
Amendment No. 190Rep. Woolsey (D-CA): The amendment would prohibit the use of funds made available by division A of this Act to be used to research, develop, test, evaluate, or procure the V-22 Osprey aircraft.
Amendment No. 191Rep. Woolsey (D-CA): The amendment would prohibit the use of funds made available by division A of this Act to be used to research, develop, test, evaluate, or procure the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle.
Amendment No. 339Rep. Inslee (D-WA): The amendment would reduce funding for all defense spending in the billexcept the Defense Health Programby 2.7 percent.
Amendment No. 340Rep. Inslee (D-WA): The amendment would reduce all Department of Defense appropriations by 1.6 percent, with the exception of Title I (Military Personnel), the Defense Health Program, and any amount required to be made available by a provision in law.
Amendment No. 233Rep. Kucinich (D-OH): The amendment would prohibit any funding from being used for missile defense at the Department of Defense.
Amendment No. 53Rep. Paul (R-TX): The amendment would strike section 2114 of the bill regarding International Security Assistance, Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund, Foreign Military Financing Programs, etc.
Amendment No. 95Rep. Jones (R-NC): The amendment would reduce by $400 million the amount made available to the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund. The amendment would also increase by $400 million the amount made available to the Defense Spending Reduction Account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
Amendment No. 170Rep. McGovern (D-MA): The amendment would prohibit funds made available in this Act from being used by the Department of Defense to conduct military operations in Afghanistan during fiscal year 2011 unless the funds were fully offset by reductions in other spending accounts.
Amendment No. 232Rep. Nadler (D-NY): prohibit funds in excess of $10 billion to be used for Afghanistan. Amendment No. 237Rep. Holt (D-NJ): The amendment would eliminate the Iraq Security Forces Fund, funded at $1.5 billion.
Amendment No. 92Rep. Heller (R-NV): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available in this Act from being used to designate monuments under the Antiques Act of 1906 (16 U.S.C. 431, et seq.).
Amendment No. 193Rep. Lummis (R-WY): The amendment would reduce the funding for the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land management, Land Acquisition by $2,750,000, available unobligated prior year funds reduced by $2,250,000, Department of Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Services, Land Acquisition by 15,055,000, available unobligated prior year funds by $2,500,000, the Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, land Acquisition by 9,100,000 and available unobligated prior year funds reduced by $3,400,000. The funds, $35,055,000 would be transferred into the spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
Amendment No. 203Rep. Labrador (R-ID): The amendment would prohibit any funds under the bill from being made available to designate monuments under the Antiquities Act of 1096.
Amendment No. 354Rep. Pearce (R-NM): The amendment would eliminate funding for the Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Land Acquisition account.
Amendment No. 356Rep. McClintock (R-CA): The amendment would eliminate funding for the Department of Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Land Acquisition account.
Amendment No. 358Rep. McClintock (R-CA): The amendment would eliminate funding for the Department of Interior, National Park Service, Land Acquisition and State Assistance account.
Amendment No. 359Rep. McClintock (R-CA): The amendment would eliminate funding for the Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Land Acquisition account.
Amendment No. 166Rep. Guinta (R-NH): The amendment would prohibit the use of funds made available by this Act to be used to enter into, after the date of enactment of this Act, a government contract that requires a project labor agreement.
Amendment No. 185Rep. Gingrey (R-GA): The amendment would prohibit federal employees from using official time to collectively bargain on behalf of a union against their employer. This amendment has the same effect as H.R. 122, which would eliminate taxpayer-subsidized union activities.
Amendment No. 209Rep. Rokita (R-IN): The amendment would prohibit any funds under the bill from being used to pay the salary of any Federal employee for time spent by that employee working for, or on behalf of, a labor organization.
Amendment No. 224Rep. Quayle (R-AZ): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available by this Act from being used to carry out the Davis-Bacon Act.
Amendment No. 255Rep. Huelskamp (R-KS): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available by this Act from being used by the National labor Relations Board to certify the results of an election of a labor organization under section 9 (c)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act that is not conducted by secret ballot.
Amendment No. 273Rep. King (R-IA): The amendment would prohibit funds made available by this Act from being used to administer the wage-rate requirements of subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, with respect to any project or program funded by this Act.
Amendment No. 214Rep. Kline (R-MN): The amendment would prohibit funds in the bill from being used to implement regulations on Program Integrity: Gainful EmploymentNew Programs published by the Department of Education.
Amendment No. 41Rep. Norton (D-DC): The amendment would decrease funding for D.C. Opportunity Scholarships by $2.3 million (funded at $15.5 million in the bill) and transfer the $2.3 million to expand quality public charter schools (funded at $20 million in the bill). The amendment also provides $1 million for administering assessments. Amendment No. 133Rep. Chu (D-CA): The amendment would increase the funding for DC public schools by $5,585,000 and decrease funding for DC opportunity scholarships by $5,585,000.
Amendment No. 239Rep. Jackson Lee (D-TX): The amendment would increase the maximum Pell grant a student is eligible for from $4,015 to $4,860.
Amendment No. 43Rep. Sessions (R-TX): The amendment reduces funding for the Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Capital and Debt Service Grants to the National Railroad Passenger Corporation from $850 million to $403.1 million and transfers the savings into the Spending Reduction Account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
H.Con.Res. 34 Establishing the budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2012 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2013 through 2021.
Amendment 2 Garrett (RSC) Substitute Would establish a Fiscal Year 2012 budget and set the appropriate budgetary levels for Fiscal Year 2011 through 2021.
Debt Limit Ceiling
Entitlement Reform
H J Res 48 Short term fiscal 2011 continuing appropriations
Defunding Planned Parenthood
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
HR 421 Full Faith and Credit Act
HR 408 Spending Reduction Act of 2011
HJ Res 5 Spending Limit Amendment
HJ Res 44 Further Continuing Appropriations Amendments, 2011
HR 1473 Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011
HR 1 Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 HR 909 Road map for Americas Energy Future
HR 1167 Welfare Reform Act of 2011
Balanced Budget Amendment
Amendments to HR 1
o RSC Jordan Amendment - #104 to cut an additional $20 billion
o Obamacare amendments all of them
o Amendment No. 84Rep. Pompeo (R-KS): The amendment would reduce funding for the EPA and Environmental Programs and Management by $8.4 million and increase funding for spending reduction account by $8.4 million. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
o Amendment No. 149Rep. Luetkemeyer (R-MO): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available in this Act from being used for contributions to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
o Amendment No. 165Rep. Carter (R-TX): The amendment would prohibit the use of funds made available by this Act to be used to implement, administer, or enforce the rule entitled national Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants published by the EPA.
o Amendment No. 198Rep. Poe (R-TX): The amendment would prohibit the use of funds made available by this Act to be used by the EPA to implement, administer, or enforce (1) a cap and trade program; or (2) and requirements pertaining to the emissions of green house gases.
o Amendment No. 201Rep. Labrador (R-ID): The amendment would prohibit any funding under the bill from being used by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to finalize the proposed rule entitled, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters published by the EPA on June 4, 2010; or to implement or enforce any finalized version of this rule.
o Amendment No. 202Rep. Labrador (R-ID): The amendment would prohibit any funding under the bill from being made available to the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). According to the White House, the CEQ coordinates Federal environmental efforts and works closely with agencies and other White House offices in the development of environmental policies and initiatives. CEQ was established within the Executive Office of the President by Congress as part of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and additional responsibilities were provided by the Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970.
o Amendment No. 251Rep. Scalise (R-LA): The amendment would prohibit the funds made available by this Act from further delaying the approval of any exploration plan, development operation coordination document, development production plan, application for permit to drill, or application to sidetrack for purposes of Outer Continental Shelf energy exploration
o Amendment No. 27Rep. Markey (D-MA): The amendment would prohibit any of the funds made available by this Act from being used to issue any new lease that authorizes the production of oil or natural gas under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to any lessee under any existing lease issued by the Department of the Interior pursuant to the Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act where such existing lease is not subject to limitations on royalty relief based on market prices.
o Amendment No. 65Rep. Polis (D-CO): The amendment would allow any funds made available by this Act to be used for expenditures that the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency determines to be necessary to protect the public health or prevent severe environmental degradation after climate change.
o Amendment No. 66Rep. Polis (D-CO): The amendment would allow any funds made available by this Act to be used for expenditures that the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency determines to be necessary to protect the public health or prevent severe environmental degradation after Clean Air Act.
o Amendment No. 90Rep. Heller (R-NV): Yucca Mountain o Amendment No. 91Rep. Heller (R-NV): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available in this Act from being used by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to conduct adjudicatory functions, technical review, or support activities associated with the Yucca Mountain geologic repository license application.
o Amendment No. 174Rep. Heller (R-NV): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available by this Act from being used for the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository.
o Amendment No. 234Rep. Kucinich (D-OH): The amendment would increase commitments to loan guarantees under the Department of Energy, Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Authority Loan Program by $26 million.
o Amendment No. 9Rep. Stearns (R-FL): The amendment would restrict funds made available by this Act from being used to implement the Report and Order of the Federal Communication Commission relating to the matter of preserving the open Internet and broadband industry practices.
o Amendment No. 25Rep. Graves (R-GA): The amendment would prohibit any of the funds made available by this Act from being used to implement or enforce the Report and Order of the Federal Communications Commission relating to the matter of preserving the open Internet and broadband industry practices (FCC 10-201).
o Amendment No. 34Rep. Garret (R-NJ): The amendment reduces funding for the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities, National Endowment for the Arts, Grants and Administration by $145, eliminating funding for the account. The funds would be transferred into the spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
o Amendment No. 35Rep. Garrett (R-NJ): The amendment reduces funding for the Institute of Museum and Library Services by $265.8 million, eliminating funding for the account. The funds would be transferred into the spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
o Amendment No. 73Rep. Royce (R-CA): The amendment would reduce by $10.7 million the amount made available to Related Programs, East-West Center. The amendment would also increase by $10.7 million the State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Spending Reduction Account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
o Amendment No. 77 Rep. Royce (R-CA): The amendment would limit the amount made available to the General Services Administration for the acquisition of new vehicles for the federal fleet, with a baseline for fiscal year 2012 and each fiscal year thereafter at 80 percent of the amount made available for fiscal year 2011.
o Amendment No. 80Rep. Gardner (R-CO): The amendment would prevent the use of funds made available by this Act from being used to first-class or business-class airfare for federal employees for domestic travel.
o Amendment No. 81Rep. Gardner (R-CO): The amendment would reduce by 50 percent the amount of funds made available by this Act to pay for expenses for official travel.
o Amendment No. 196Rep. Walberg (R-MI): The amendment would reduce funding for National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities, National Endowment for the Arts, Grants and Administration by $20,594,000. The funds, $20,594,000 would be transferred into the spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
o Amendment No. 248Rep. Canseco (R-TX): The amendment would reduce funding for the East West Center o Amendment No. 249Rep. Canseco (R-TX): The amendment would reduce funding for National Capital Arts and Cultural Affairs by $4,500,000. The funds would be transferred to the spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
o Amendment No. 250Rep. Canseco (R-TX): The amendment would reduce by $12,510,000 National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities, National Endowment for the Humanities, Grants and Administration. The amendment would also increase by $12,510,000 the amount made available to the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Spending Reduction Account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
o Amendment No. 256Rep. Huelskamp (R-KS): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available by this Act from being used to pay the travel expenses of any employee of the U.S. federal government who travels using a first-class ticket.
o Amendment No. 264Rep. Broun (R-GA): The amendment would prohibit funds from being used for vacant federal properties.
o Amendment No. 371Rep. Flake (R-AZ): The amendment would reduce funding for payments under the Community Service Block Grant Act by $100 million, from $405 million to $305 million. The savings would be transferred to the spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
o Amendment No. 380Reps. Tom Reed (R-NY), and Tom Graves (R-GA): The amendment would eliminate funding for the Bilateral Economic Assistance, Funds Appropriate to the President, Democracy Fund, appropriated at $112,800,000 and would transfer the savings to the Spending Reduction Account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
o Amendment No. 120Rep. Gohmert (R-TX): The amendment would prohibit any assistance made available by this Act from being provided to a country that opposed the position of the United States in the United Nations, subject to exemptions by the Secretary of State or the President, with opposed the position of the United States defined as a member country voting with the U.S. less than 50 percent of the time in the most recent session of the General Assembly.
o Amendment No. 227Rep. Goodlatte (R-VA): The amendment would reduce by $5,000,000 the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, State and Local Programs. The amendment would also increase by $5,000,000 the amount made available to the Homeland Security Spending Reduction Account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill
o Amendment No. 42Rep. Sessions (R-TX): The amendment would prohibit funds made available by the bill to be used to implement any policy, directive, administrative regulation, circular, or action to convert from private sector to public sector performance any functions or positions that are not inherently governmental in nature.
o Amendment No. 46Rep. Polis (D-CO): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available by the bill from being used to maintain an end strength level of members of the Armed Forces of the United States assigned to permanent duty in Europe in excess of 35,000 members and end strength levels for active duty members of the Army, Navy, and Air Force of 565,275, 328,250, and 329,275, respectively. o Amendment No. 161Rep. Quigley (-IL): The amendment would reduce funding for the Navys Air Craft Procurement by $1,083,333,333.33 and the Air Forces Air Craft Procurement by $216,666,666.67. The funds, $1,300,000,000 would be transferred into the Defense spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
o Amendment No. 162Rep. Quigley (-IL): The amendment would reduce funding the expenses for the Armys research, development, test and evaluation by $971,099,800, the expenses for the Navys research, development, test and evaluation by $1,796,130,300, the expenses for the Air Forces research, development, test and evaluation by $2,674,240,500 and the expenses for the Department of Defense by $2,079,741,210. The funds, $7,521,211,800, would be transferred into the Defense spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
o Amendment No. 168Rep. Larson (-CT): The amendment would reduce funding the expenses for the Navys research, development, test and evaluation by $225,000,000 and the expenses for the Air Forces research, development, test and evaluation by $225,000,000. The funds, $450,000,000 would be transferred into the Defense spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
o Amendment No. 189Rep. Woolsey (D-CA): The amendment would prohibit funding under the bill for Expeditionary Fighting Vehicles, and the V-22 Osprey aircraft.
o Amendment No. 190Rep. Woolsey (D-CA): The amendment would prohibit the use of funds made available by division A of this Act to be used to research, develop, test, evaluate, or procure the V-22 Osprey aircraft.
o Amendment No. 191Rep. Woolsey (D-CA): The amendment would prohibit the use of funds made available by division A of this Act to be used to research, develop, test, evaluate, or procure the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle.
o Amendment No. 339Rep. Inslee (D-WA): The amendment would reduce funding for all defense spending in the billexcept the Defense Health Programby 2.7 percent.
o Amendment No. 340Rep. Inslee (D-WA): The amendment would reduce all Department of Defense appropriations by 1.6 percent, with the exception of Title I (Military Personnel), the Defense Health Program, and any amount required to be made available by a provision in law.
o Amendment No. 233Rep. Kucinich (D-OH): The amendment would prohibit any funding from being used for missile defense at the Department of Defense.
o Amendment No. 53Rep. Paul (R-TX): The amendment would strike section 2114 of the bill regarding International Security Assistance, Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund, Foreign Military Financing Programs, etc.
o Amendment No. 95Rep. Jones (R-NC): The amendment would reduce by $400 million the amount made available to the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund. The amendment would also increase by $400 million the amount made available to the Defense Spending Reduction Account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
o Amendment No. 170Rep. McGovern (D-MA): The amendment would prohibit funds made available in this Act from being used by the Department of Defense to conduct military operations in Afghanistan during fiscal year 2011 unless the funds were fully offset by reductions in other spending accounts.
o Amendment No. 232Rep. Nadler (D-NY): prohibit funds in excess of $10 billion to be used for Afghanistan. o Amendment No. 237Rep. Holt (D-NJ): The amendment would eliminate the Iraq Security Forces Fund, funded at $1.5 billion.
o Amendment No. 92Rep. Heller (R-NV): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available in this Act from being used to designate monuments under the Antiques Act of 1906 (16 U.S.C. 431, et seq.).
o Amendment No. 193Rep. Lummis (R-WY): The amendment would reduce the funding for the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land management, Land Acquisition by $2,750,000, available unobligated prior year funds reduced by $2,250,000, Department of Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Services, Land Acquisition by 15,055,000, available unobligated prior year funds by $2,500,000, the Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, land Acquisition by 9,100,000 and available unobligated prior year funds reduced by $3,400,000. The funds, $35,055,000 would be transferred into the spending reduction account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
o Amendment No. 203Rep. Labrador (R-ID): The amendment would prohibit any funds under the bill from being made available to designate monuments under the Antiquities Act of 1096.
o Amendment No. 354Rep. Pearce (R-NM): The amendment would eliminate funding for the Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Land Acquisition account.
o Amendment No. 356Rep. McClintock (R-CA): The amendment would eliminate funding for the Department of Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Land Acquisition account.
o Amendment No. 358Rep. McClintock (R-CA): The amendment would eliminate funding for the Department of Interior, National Park Service, Land Acquisition and State Assistance account.
o Amendment No. 359Rep. McClintock (R-CA): The amendment would eliminate funding for the Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Land Acquisition account.
o Amendment No. 166Rep. Guinta (R-NH): The amendment would prohibit the use of funds made available by this Act to be used to enter into, after the date of enactment of this Act, a government contract that requires a project labor agreement.
o Amendment No. 185Rep. Gingrey (R-GA): The amendment would prohibit federal employees from using official time to collectively bargain on behalf of a union against their employer. This amendment has the same effect as H.R. 122, which would eliminate taxpayer-subsidized union activities.
o Amendment No. 209Rep. Rokita (R-IN): The amendment would prohibit any funds under the bill from being used to pay the salary of any Federal employee for time spent by that employee working for, or on behalf of, a labor organization.
o Amendment No. 224Rep. Quayle (R-AZ): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available by this Act from being used to carry out the Davis-Bacon Act.
o Amendment No. 255Rep. Huelskamp (R-KS): The amendment would prohibit any funds made available by this Act from being used by the National labor Relations Board to certify the results of an election of a labor organization under section 9 (c)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act that is not conducted by secret ballot.
o Amendment No. 273Rep. King (R-IA): The amendment would prohibit funds made available by this Act from being used to administer the wage-rate requirements of subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, with respect to any project or program funded by this Act.
o Amendment No. 214Rep. Kline (R-MN): The amendment would prohibit funds in the bill from being used to implement regulations on Program Integrity: Gainful EmploymentNew Programs published by the Department of Education.
o Amendment No. 41Rep. Norton (D-DC): The amendment would decrease funding for D.C. Opportunity Scholarships by $2.3 million (funded at $15.5 million in the bill) and transfer the $2.3 million to expand quality public charter schools (funded at $20 million in the bill). The amendment also provides $1 million for administering assessments. o Amendment No. 133Rep. Chu (D-CA): The amendment would increase the funding for DC public schools by $5,585,000 and decrease funding for DC opportunity scholarships by $5,585,000.
o Amendment No. 239Rep. Jackson Lee (D-TX): The amendment would increase the maximum Pell grant a student is eligible for from $4,015 to $4,860.
o Amendment No. 43Rep. Sessions (R-TX): The amendment reduces funding for the Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Capital and Debt Service Grants to the National Railroad Passenger Corporation from $850 million to $403.1 million and transfers the savings into the Spending Reduction Account. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account are designated as savings and lower the 302(b) allocation for a given subcommittee. Funds transferred into the spending reduction account cannot be allocated elsewhere in the bill.
H.Con.Res. 34 Establishing the budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2012 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2013 through 2021.
Amendment #2 Garrett (RSC) Substitute Would establish a Fiscal Year 2012 budget and set the appropriate budgetary levels for Fiscal Year 2011 through 2021.
Debt Limit Ceiling
Entitlement Reform
H J Res 48 Short term fiscal 2011 continuing appropriations
Defunding Planned Parenthood