Loading…
Countering ALBA Act of 2013
Legislative Progress
Momentum (last 30 days)
0
score
0 actions · 0 new cosponsors · 0 votes
Speed vs cohort
75pct
52d open
vs 5,821 other HR bills in the 113th — cohort avg 49d
No CRS summary is available for this bill yet. The source title, actions, sponsors, and text versions below come from Congress.gov.
These links require the bill number to appear in the filing's source-reported specific issue text. Client expenses and lobbying-firm income are separate disclosure fields.
Filing registrants (3)
2016 · fourth_quarter · Taxation/Internal Revenue Code
Monitor potential initiatives to impose a tax on sugar sweetened beverages; oppose H.R. 1687, the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Tax Act of 2014
Client expense: $290,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Bills with similar content found using semantic analysis.
Sources: Congress.gov
Government targets: Agriculture, Dept of (USDA), Defense, Dept of (DOD), Energy, Dept of, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Executive Office of the President (EOP), Food & Drug Administration (FDA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), SENATE, Transportation, Dept of (DOT), U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
2016 · third_quarter · Taxation/Internal Revenue Code
Monitor potential initiatives to impose a tax on sugar sweetened beverages; oppose H.R. 1687, the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Tax Act of 2014
Client expense: $330,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Agriculture, Dept of (USDA), Defense, Dept of (DOD), Energy, Dept of, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Executive Office of the President (EOP), Food & Drug Administration (FDA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), SENATE, Transportation, Dept of (DOT)
2016 · second_quarter · Taxation/Internal Revenue Code
Monitor potential initiatives to impose a tax on sugar sweetened beverages; oppose H.R. 1687, the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Tax Act of 2014
Client expense: $260,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Agriculture, Dept of (USDA), Defense, Dept of (DOD), Energy, Dept of, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Executive Office of the President (EOP), Food & Drug Administration (FDA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), SENATE, Transportation, Dept of (DOT)
2016 · first_quarter · Taxation/Internal Revenue Code
Monitor potential initiatives to impose a tax on sugar sweetened beverages; oppose H.R. 1687, the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Tax Act of 2014
Client expense: $280,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Agriculture, Dept of (USDA), Defense, Dept of (DOD), Energy, Dept of, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Executive Office of the President (EOP), Food & Drug Administration (FDA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), SENATE, Transportation, Dept of (DOT)
2015 · fourth_quarter · Taxation/Internal Revenue Code
Monitor potential initiatives to impose a tax on sugar sweetened beverages; oppose H.R. 1687, the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Tax Act of 2014
Client expense: $260,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Agriculture, Dept of (USDA), Defense, Dept of (DOD), Energy, Dept of, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Executive Office of the President (EOP), Food & Drug Administration (FDA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), SENATE, Transportation, Dept of (DOT)
2015 · third_quarter · Taxation/Internal Revenue Code
Monitor potential initiatives to impose a tax on sugar sweetened beverages; oppose H.R. 1687, the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Tax Act of 2014
Client expense: $360,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Agriculture, Dept of (USDA), Defense, Dept of (DOD), Energy, Dept of, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Executive Office of the President (EOP), Food & Drug Administration (FDA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), SENATE, Transportation, Dept of (DOT)
2015 · third_quarter · Taxation/Internal Revenue Code
Monitor potential initiatives to impose a tax on sugar sweetened beverages; oppose H.R. 1687, the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Tax Act of 2014.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $110,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), SENATE, White House Office
2015 · second_quarter · Taxation/Internal Revenue Code
Monitor potential initiatives to impose a tax on sugar sweetened beverages; oppose H.R. 1687, the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Tax Act of 2014
Client expense: $350,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Agriculture, Dept of (USDA), Defense, Dept of (DOD), Executive Office of the President (EOP), Food & Drug Administration (FDA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), SENATE, Transportation, Dept of (DOT)
2015 · second_quarter · Taxation/Internal Revenue Code
Monitor potential initiatives to impose a tax on sugar sweetened beverages; oppose H.R. 1687, the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Tax Act of 2014.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $110,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), SENATE
2015 · first_quarter · Taxation/Internal Revenue Code
Monitor potential initiatives to impose a tax on sugar sweetened beverages; oppose H.R. 1687, the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Tax Act of 2014.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $110,000
Government targets: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), SENATE
2013 · third_quarter · Energy/Nuclear
Monitored issues related to vehicles and fuels (including ethanol) and H.R.1687/S.1603.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2013 · second_quarter · Energy/Nuclear
Monitored issues related to vehicles and fuels (including ethanol) and H.R.1687/S.1603.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2013 · first_quarter · Energy/Nuclear
Monitored issues related to vehicles and fuels (including ethanol) and H.R.1687/S.1603.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE