Loading…
Ensuring the Safety of Our Military Aviators Act of 2017
Legislative Progress
Introduced
January 10, 2017
Latest Action
February 21, 2017
Primary Sponsor
Blake FarentholdRepublican(TX)
Momentum (last 30 days)
0
score
0 actions · 0 new cosponsors · 0 votes
Speed vs cohort
80pct
42d open
vs 7,393 other HR bills in the 115th — cohort avg 50d
Ensuring the Safety of Our Military Aviators Act of 2017 This bill prohibits the Department of Defense from approving any application for the construction or alteration of a wind turbine that is proposed to be constructed or altered within 25 miles of a military airbase or military airfield.
These links require the bill number to appear in the filing's source-reported specific issue text. Client expenses and lobbying-firm income are separate disclosure fields.
Filing registrants (3)
2017 · fourth_quarter · Defense
Opposed legislation restricting the development of wind energy facilities near certain military installations (S. 201, H.R. 649, H.R. 403). Supporting the Defense Department's current clearing house effort to evaluate projects on a case by case basis. National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810, S. 1519): discussion of language modifying approval process for energy projects near military air installations.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Readiness.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Aviation.
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Congress.gov source codes: H11100, H11100-A
Introduced in House
Congress.gov source codes: 1000, Intro-H
Bills with similar content found using semantic analysis.
Sources: Congress.gov
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $30,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2017 · fourth_quarter · Defense
Opposed bills restricting the development of wind energy facilities near certain military installations (S. 201, H.R. 649, H.R. 403). Supported the Defense Department's current clearing house approach to evaluate each project on a case by case basis. National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810, S. 1519): discussion of language impacting the process for permitting the construction of energy projects near military air facilities.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $20,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2017 · third_quarter · Defense
Opposed legislation restricting the development of wind energy facilities near certain military installations (S. 201, H.R. 649, H.R. 403). Supporting the Defense Department's current clearing house effort to evaluate projects on a case by case basis. National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810, S. 1519): discussion of language modifying approval process for energy projects near military air installations.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $30,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Interior, Dept of (DOI), SENATE
2017 · third_quarter · Defense
Opposed bills restricting the development of wind energy facilities near certain military installations (S. 201, H.R. 649, H.R. 403). Supported the Defense Department's current clearing house approach to evaluate each project on a case by case basis. National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810, S. 1519): discussion of language impacting the process for permitting the construction of energy projects near military air facilities.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $20,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Interior, Dept of (DOI), SENATE
2017 · second_quarter · Defense
Opposed legislation restricting the development of wind energy facilities near certain military installations (S. 201, H.R. 649, H.R. 403). Supporting the Defense Department's current clearing house effort to evaluate projects on a case by case basis. National Defense Authorization Act: discussion of language modifying approval process for energy projects near military air installations.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $30,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Interior, Dept of (DOI), SENATE
2017 · second_quarter · Defense
Opposed bills restricting the development of wind energy facilities near certain military installations (S. 201, H.R. 649, H.R. 403). Supported the Defense Department's current clearing house approach to evaluate each project on a case by case basis. National Defense Authorization Act: discussion of language impacting permitting of energy projects near military bases.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $20,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Interior, Dept of (DOI), SENATE
2017 · second_quarter · Defense
All wind energy related provisions in H.R. 403, Ensuring the Safety of Our Military Aviators Act of 2017 All wind energy related provisions in H.R. 2810, National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2018; specifically the Buck amendment #398 All wind energy related provisions in S. 1519, National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2018
Client expense: $170,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2017 · first_quarter · Defense
Oppose H.R. 403, Ensuring the Safety of Our Military Aviators Act of 2017
Client expense: $170,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2017 · first_quarter · Transportation
H.R.403 - Ensuring the Safety of Our Military Aviators Act of 2017 (wind energy permitting and siting) FAA Reauthorization (wind energy permitting and siting)
Client expense: $170,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Internal Revenue Service (IRS), SENATE, Treasury, Dept of
2017 · first_quarter · Defense
Opposed bills restricting the development of wind energy facilities near certain military installations (S. 201, H.R. 649, H.R. 403). Supported the Defense Department's current clearing house approach to evaluate each project on a case by case basis.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $20,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Interior, Dept of (DOI), SENATE
2017 · first_quarter · Defense
Opposed legislation restricting the development of wind energy facilities near certain military installations (S. 201, H.R. 649, H.R. 403). Supporting the Defense Department's current clearing house effort to evaluate projects on a case by case basis.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $30,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Interior, Dept of (DOI), SENATE