Legislative Progress
Momentum (last 30 days)
0
score
0 actions · 0 new cosponsors · 0 votes
Speed vs cohort
51pct
1d open
vs 9,062 other HR bills in the 116th — cohort avg 39d
Water Infrastructure Sustainability and Efficiency Act or the WISE Act This bill requires each state to use a certain percentage of funds it receives for capitalization of its clean water state revolving fund for projects to address green infrastructure, water or energy efficiency improvements, or other environmentally innovative activities.
These links require the bill number to appear in the filing's source-reported specific issue text. Client expenses and lobbying-firm income are separate disclosure fields.
Filing registrants (1)
2019 · third_quarter · Clean Air and Water (quality)
Support H.R.1497, H.R.2458, H.R.3052, S.2580, and H.R.2377. Oppose H.R.1764, EPA's Waters of the United States Repeal Rule, EPA's Waters of the United States Replacement Rule, EPA's Lead and Copper Rule, EPA's Interpretative Statement clarifying the application of Clean Water Act permitting requirements to groundwater, EPA's PFAS Action Plan. Support PFAS in regulation in the National Defense Authorization Act. Phaseout out of the chemical on military bases. Regulating under CERCLA.
Client expense: $10,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Introduced in House
Congress.gov source codes: 1000, Intro-H
Bills with similar content found using semantic analysis.
Sources: Congress.gov
Government targets: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2019 · second_quarter · Clean Air and Water (quality)
Lobbied to defend clean water. Support phaseout of PFAS on military installations. Support PFAS being regulated under CERCLA. Support S. 1790; H.R. 2500; H.R. 2458; H.R. 1497; H.R. 2741; Oppose H.R. 1764. Oppose EPA PFAS Action Plan; EPA Waters Of The United States Rule; EPA Interpretative Statement on groundwater. Lobbied around issues related to the EPA Lead and Copper Rule, Mercury Rule, Paris Treaty bill, and Methane Rule.
Client expense: $20,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
| Democratic |
| CA |