Loading…
Help Grandfamilies Prevent Child Abuse Act
Legislative Progress
Momentum (last 30 days)
0
score
0 actions · 0 new cosponsors · 0 votes
Speed vs cohort
0pct
0d open
vs 9,698 other HR bills in the 117th — cohort avg 63d
Help Grandfamilies Prevent Child Abuse Act This bill expands the activities and functions of child welfare programs that support kinship caregiving (i.e., grandparents or other extended family members that provide child caregiving). The bill also expands grants programs for preventing child abuse to prioritize and support the needs of such kinship families.
These links require the bill number to appear in the filing's source-reported specific issue text. Client expenses and lobbying-firm income are separate disclosure fields.
Filing registrants (2)
2022 · fourth_quarter · Civil Rights/Civil Liberties
Contacts in opposition to the Equality Act (H.R. 5/S. 393) because this legislation contains language that could be construed to create a right to demand abortion from health care providers, and likely would place at risk the authority of state and federal government to prohibit taxpayer-funded abortions. Contacts in opposition to the For the People Act of 2021 and Freedom to Vote Act (H.R. 1/S.1/S. 2093/S.2747/H.R. 5746/H.R. 2747 H.9/S.9) and similar legislation because this legislation would severely impede the exercise of our organizations constitutional rights, and the rights and privacy of our donors and supporters.
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
Introduced in House
Congress.gov source codes: 1000, Intro-H
Bills with similar content found using semantic analysis.
Sources: Congress.gov
Client expense: $80,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2022 · third_quarter · Civil Rights/Civil Liberties
Contacts in opposition to the Equality Act (H.R. 5/S. 393) because this legislation contains language that could be construed to create a right to demand abortion from health care providers, and likely would place at risk the authority of state and federal government to prohibit taxpayer-funded abortions. Contacts in opposition to the For the People Act of 2021 and Freedom to Vote Act (H.R. 1/S.1/S. 2093/S.2747/H.R. 5746/H.R. 2747 H.9/S.9) and similar legislation because this legislation would severely impede the exercise of our organizations constitutional rights, and the rights and privacy of our donors and supporters.
Client expense: $70,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2022 · second_quarter · Civil Rights/Civil Liberties
Contacts in opposition to the Equality Act (H.R. 5/S. 393) because this legislation contains language that could be construed to create a right to demand abortion from health care providers, and likely would place at risk the authority of state and federal government to prohibit taxpayer-funded abortions. Contacts in opposition to the For the People Act of 2021 and Freedom to Vote Act (H.R. 1/S.1/S. 2093/S.2747/H.R. 5746/H.R. 2747 H.9/S.9) because this legislation would severely impede the exercise of our organizations constitutional rights, and the rights and privacy of our donors and supporters.
Client expense: $60,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2022 · first_quarter · Civil Rights/Civil Liberties
S4, HR 4- John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act HR 2747- Freedom to Vote Act HR 1620- Violence Against Women Act
Client expense: $590,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2022 · first_quarter · Civil Rights/Civil Liberties
Contacts in opposition to the Equality Act (H.R. 5/S. 393) because this legislation contains language that could be construed to create a right to demand abortion from health care providers, and likely would place at risk the authority of state and federal government to prohibit taxpayer-funded abortions. Contacts in opposition to the For the People Act of 2021 and Freedom to Vote Act (H.R. 1/S.1/S. 2093/S.2747/H.R. 5746/H.R. 2747 H.9/S.9) because this legislation would severely impede the exercise of our organizations constitutional rights, and the rights and privacy of our donors and supporters.
Client expense: $80,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2021 · fourth_quarter · Civil Rights/Civil Liberties
Contacts in opposition to the Equality Act (H.R. 5/S. 393) because this legislation contains language that could be construed to create a right to demand abortion from health care providers, and likely would place at risk the authority of state and federal government to prohibit taxpayer-funded abortions. Contacts in opposition to the For the People Act of 2021 and Freedom to Vote Act (H.R. 1/S.1/S. 2093/S.2747/H.R. 5746/H.R. 2747) because this legislation would severely impede the exercise of our organizations constitutional rights, and the rights and privacy of our donors and supporters.
Client expense: $60,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE