Loading…
Foreign-Trade Zone Export Enhancement Act of 2025
Legislative Progress
Momentum (last 30 days)
0
score
0 actions · 0 new cosponsors · 0 votes
Speed vs cohort
0pct
0d open
vs 10,940 other HR bills in the 119th — cohort avg 30d
No CRS summary is available for this bill yet. The source title, actions, sponsors, and text versions below come from Congress.gov.
These links require the bill number to appear in the filing's source-reported specific issue text. Client expenses and lobbying-firm income are separate disclosure fields.
Filing registrants (4)
2026 · third_quarter · Trade (domestic/foreign)
PF Status restrictions on U.S. FTZs by Trade Remedy Tariffs; H.R. 6792 / S.4793 - Foreign-Trade Zone Export Enhancement Act of 2025
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Introduced in House
Congress.gov source codes: 1000, Intro-H
Bills with similar content found using semantic analysis.
Sources: Congress.gov
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $20,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Intl Trade Administration (ITA), SENATE, U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
2026 · third_quarter · Trade (domestic/foreign)
Issues related to manufacturing processes in foreign trade zones (FTZ) within H.R. 6792 the Foreign Trade Zone Export Enhancement Act of 2025.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $70,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2026 · third_quarter · Trade (domestic/foreign)
Policies and proposals related to the automotive supply industry, including trade agreements such as the USMCA and section 232, section 301, and global tariffs. H.R. 6792/S. 4793, Foreign-Trade Zone Enhancement Act of 2025.
Client expense: $140,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE, U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
2026 · third_quarter · Trade (domestic/foreign)
H.R. 6792 / S.4793 - Foreign-Trade Zone Export Enhancement Act of 2025; Challenges with PF status requirement in trade remedy tariffs for U.S. FTZs and the detriment to U.S. manufacturing created by these restrictions; Delays in production authority decisions for U.S. FTZs; Initiation of a U.S. FTZ Caucus; CPSC Regulation changes and impact to U.S. FTZ filing
Client expense: $30,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Commerce, Dept of (DOC), Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Homeland Security, Dept of (DHS), Intl Trade Administration (ITA), SENATE, U.S. Customs & Border Protection, U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
2026 · second_quarter · Trade (domestic/foreign)
Issues related to manufacturing processes in foreign trade zones (FTZ) within H.R. 6792 the Foreign Trade Zone Export Enhancement Act of 2025.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $80,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2026 · first_quarter · Trade (domestic/foreign)
Issues related to manufacturing processes in foreign trade zones (FTZ) within H.R. 6792 the Foreign Trade Zone Export Enhancement Act of 2025.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $80,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2025 · fourth_quarter · Trade (domestic/foreign)
Issues related to foreign trade zone permitting for gelatin product processing. USMCA implementation issues related to manufacturing processes in foreign trade zones (FTZ) within H.R.6792 - To clarify provisions of the United States Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act and Foreign Trade Zones Act with respect to the appropriate tariff treatment of merchandise in a United States foreign-trade zone, and for other purposes.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $80,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE, U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
| Republican |
| PA |
| Monica De La Cruz | Republican | TX |
| Vern Buchanan | Republican | FL |
| Vicente Gonzalez | Democratic | TX |
| Virginia Foxx | Republican | NC |
| William R. Timmons IV | Republican | SC |