Loading…
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include electric charging of certain vehicles as a qualified transportation fringe benefit excluded from gross income.
Legislative Progress
Introduced
September 28, 2016
Latest Action
September 28, 2016
Primary Sponsor
Sherrod BrownDemocratic(OH)
Momentum (last 30 days)
0
score
0 actions · 0 new cosponsors · 0 votes
Speed vs cohort
0pct
0d open
vs 3,548 other S bills in the 114th — cohort avg 43d
This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to treat the charging of an electric vehicle provided on or near the business premises of the employer as a qualified transportation fringe benefit that is excluded from an employee's gross income. The bill limits the benefit to $175 per month (adjusted for inflation) and specifies requirements for the electric vehicles.
These links require the bill number to appear in the filing's source-reported specific issue text. Client expenses and lobbying-firm income are separate disclosure fields.
Filing registrants (1)
2016 · third_quarter · Food Industry (safety, labeling, etc.)
The Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2014 (HR 1599) Biotechnology Labeling Solutions Act (S.2609) Amendment S.3450 to S.764 The Roberts-Stabenow Biotech Labeling Agreement (S.764)
Client expense: $180,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Introduced in Senate
Bills with similar content found using semantic analysis.
Sources: Congress.gov
Government targets: Agriculture, Dept of (USDA), Commerce, Dept of (DOC), Food & Drug Administration (FDA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), Patent & Trademark Office (PTO), SENATE, State, Dept of (DOS), U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
2016 · third_quarter · Food Industry (safety, labeling, etc.)
The Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2014 (HR 1599) Biotechnology Labeling Solutions Act (S.2609) Amendment S.3450 to S.764 The Roberts-Stabenow Biotech Labeling Agreement (S.764)
Client expense: $180,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Agriculture, Dept of (USDA), Commerce, Dept of (DOC), Food & Drug Administration (FDA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), Patent & Trademark Office (PTO), SENATE, State, Dept of (DOS), U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
2016 · second_quarter · Food Industry (safety, labeling, etc.)
The Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2014 (HR 1599) Biotechnology Labeling Solutions Act (S.2609) Amendment S.3450 to S.764 The Roberts-Stabenow Biotech Labeling Agreement (S.764)
Client expense: $240,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Agriculture, Dept of (USDA), Commerce, Dept of (DOC), Food & Drug Administration (FDA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), Patent & Trademark Office (PTO), SENATE, State, Dept of (DOS), U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
2016 · first_quarter · Food Industry (safety, labeling, etc.)
The Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2014 (HR 1599) Biotechnology Labeling Solutions Act (S.2609) Amendment S.3450 to S.764
Client expense: $220,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Agriculture, Dept of (USDA), Commerce, Dept of (DOC), Food & Drug Administration (FDA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), Patent & Trademark Office (PTO), SENATE, State, Dept of (DOS), U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)