Two-Generation Economic Empowerment Act of 2017
Legislative Progress
Introduced
February 16, 2017
Latest Action
February 16, 2017
Primary Sponsor
Martin HeinrichDemocratic(NM)
Momentum (last 30 days)
0
score
0 actions · 0 new cosponsors · 0 votes
Speed vs cohort
0pct
0d open
vs 3,805 other S bills in the 115th — cohort avg 41d
Two-Generation Economic Empowerment Act of 2017 This bill establishes the Interagency Council on Multigenerational Poverty to carry out specified objectives and the 2-generation approach, including by providing guidance, and addressing questions pertaining to 2-generation programs and other programs engaging in efforts to break the cycle of multigenerational poverty. The "2-generation approach" means the approach to breaking the cycle of multigenerational poverty by improving family economic security through the implementation of 2-generation pilot programs that create opportunities for, and address the needs of, parents and children together. The council shall: (1) develop, make available for public comment, and submit to the President and Congress, a national strategic plan to end and prevent multigenerational poverty; (2) ensure that specified information is made available to the public and displayed on the official website of the council, including the strategic plan and certain information on the 2-generation programs; and (3) establish the 2-generation performance partnership pilot program and the 2-generation social impact bonds pilot program. The Government Accountability Office must study and report on federal block grants under the jurisdiction of council participants to identify barriers and opportunities for collaboration in order to carry out the 2-generation approach. The Office of Management and Budget shall designate lead agencies for purposes of carrying out the 2-generation programs.
These links require the bill number to appear in the filing's source-reported specific issue text. Client expenses and lobbying-firm income are separate disclosure fields.
Filing registrants (1)
Digital and electronic Federal government IT acquisition, information security issues, including electronic signatures, electronic workflows, consumer privacy, cyber security, improving citizen's online experience and privacy shield. In favor of Public Law 115-336 and HR 1079 and S 435.
Client expense: $340,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Introduced in Senate
Bills with similar content found using semantic analysis.
Sources: Congress.gov
Government targets: Commerce, Dept of (DOC), Defense, Dept of (DOD), Energy, Dept of, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Homeland Security, Dept of (DHS), Office of Management & Budget (OMB), Patent & Trademark Office (PTO), SENATE, U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), White House Office
Digital and electronic Federal government IT acquisition, information security issues, including electronic signatures, electronic workflows, consumer privacy, cyber security, improving citizen's online experience and privacy shield. In favor of Public Law 115-336 and HR 1079 and S 435.
Client expense: $340,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Commerce, Dept of (DOC), Energy, Dept of, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Homeland Security, Dept of (DHS), Office of Management & Budget (OMB), Patent & Trademark Office (PTO), SENATE, U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), White House Office
Digital government and information security modernization and citizens facing digital service delivery; In favor of Public Law 115-336 and HR 1079 and S 435.
Client expense: $340,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Commerce, Dept of (DOC), Energy, Dept of, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Homeland Security, Dept of (DHS), Office of Management & Budget (OMB), Patent & Trademark Office (PTO), SENATE, U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), White House Office
Digital and electronic Federal government IT acquisition, information security issues, including electronic signatures, electronic workflows, consumer privacy, cyber security, improving citizen's online experience and privacy shield. In favor of Public Law 115-336 and HR 1079 and S 435.
Client expense: $350,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Commerce, Dept of (DOC), Energy, Dept of, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Homeland Security, Dept of (DHS), Office of Management & Budget (OMB), Patent & Trademark Office (PTO), SENATE, U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), White House Office
Digital government and information security modernization and citizens facing digital service delivery; In favor of Public Law 115-336 and HR 1079 and S 435.
Client expense: $350,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Commerce, Dept of (DOC), Energy, Dept of, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Homeland Security, Dept of (DHS), Office of Management & Budget (OMB), Patent & Trademark Office (PTO), SENATE, U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), White House Office
Digital and electronic Federal government IT acquisition, information security issues, including electronic signatures, electronic workflows, consumer privacy, cyber security, improving citizen's online experience and privacy shield. In favor of Public Law 115-336 and HR 1079 and S 435.
Client expense: $310,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Commerce, Dept of (DOC), Energy, Dept of, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Homeland Security, Dept of (DHS), Office of Management & Budget (OMB), Patent & Trademark Office (PTO), SENATE, U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), White House Office
Digital government and information security modernization and citizens facing digital service delivery; In favor of Public Law 115-336 and HR 1079 and S 435.
Client expense: $310,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Commerce, Dept of (DOC), Energy, Dept of, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Homeland Security, Dept of (DHS), Office of Management & Budget (OMB), Patent & Trademark Office (PTO), SENATE, U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), White House Office