A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to parental rights.

Meetings with Members of the House and Senate and their staff to urge them to support the Parental Rights Amendment to codify implied parental rights making them explicit in the Constitution. It was introduced in the 113th Congress in the House as H.J.Res. 50, in the Senate as S.J.Res. 37. The Amendment would preserve the right of parents to direct the education, upbringing, and care of their children. Urging grassroots calls and emails in support. Opposition to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, a treaty that could threaten parental rights if ratified by the U.S. Senate. Work on articles opposing the treaty, and work to educate Senators and their staff about the dangers of the treaty. Opposition to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, a U.N. treaty that could threaten parental rights of parents with children who have disabilities if ratified by the U.S. Senate. The CRPD would allow UN officials to oversee all decisions regarding children with disabilities under the treaty's use of the "best interests of the child" standard. The treaty would also cede US sovereignty to the UN.

Client expense: $40,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Speaking with staff and Members about the dangers of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Speaking with staff and Members about the dangers of the U.N. Convention On the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Speaking with staff and Members about the dangers of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. All these treaties threaten parental rights, homeschool freedom, and US sovereignty. Meetings with Members of House and Senate and their staff to urge them to support the Parental Rights Amendment. It was introduced in the 113th Congress in the House as H.J.Res. 50, and in the Senate as S.J.Res. 37. The Amendment would preserve the right of parents to direct the education, upbringing, and care of their children.

Client expense: $40,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: Education, Dept of, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Meetings with Members of the House and Senate and their staff to urge them to support the Parental Rights Amendment to codify implied parental rights making them explicit in the Constitution. It was introduced in the 113th Congress in the House as H.J.Res. 50, in the Senate as S.J.Res. 37. The Amendment would preserve the right of parents to direct the education, upbringing, and care of their children. Urging grassroots calls and emails in support. Opposition to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, a treaty that could threaten parental rights if ratified by the U.S. Senate. Work on articles opposing the treaty, and work to educate Senators and their staff about the dangers of the treaty. Opposition to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, a U.N. treaty that could threaten parental rights of parents with children who have disabilities if ratified by the U.S. Senate. The CRPD would allow UN officials to oversee all decisions regarding children with disabilities under the treaty's use of the "best interests of the child" standard. The treaty would also cede US sovereignty to the UN.

Client expense: $40,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Speaking with staff and Members about the dangers of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Speaking with staff and Members about the dangers of the U.N. Convention On the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Speaking with staff and Members about the dangers of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. All these treaties threaten parental rights, homeschool freedom, and US sovereignty. Meetings with Members of House and Senate and their staff to urge them to support the Parental Rights Amendment. It was introduced in the 113th Congress in the House as H.J.Res. 50, and in the Senate as S.J.Res. 37. The Amendment would preserve the right of parents to direct the education, upbringing, and care of their children.

Client expense: $50,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: Education, Dept of, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Meetings with Members of the House and Senate and their staff to urge them to support the Parental Rights Amendment to codify implied parental rights making them explicit in the Constitution. It was introduced in the 113th Congress in the House as H.J.Res. 50, in the Senate as S.J.Res. 37. The Amendment would preserve the right of parents to direct the education, upbringing, and care of their children. Urging grassroots calls and emails in support. Opposition to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, a treaty that could threaten parental rights if ratified by the U.S. Senate. Work on articles opposing the treaty, and work to educate Senators and their staff about the dangers of the treaty. Opposition to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, a U.N. treaty that could threaten parental rights of parents with children who have disabilities if ratified by the U.S. Senate. The CRPD would allow UN officials to oversee all decisions regarding children with disabilities under the treaty's use of the "best interests of the child" standard. The treaty would also cede US sovereignty to the UN.

Client expense: $70,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Speaking with staff and Members about the dangers of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Speaking with staff and Members about the dangers of the U.N. Convention On the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Speaking with staff and Members about the dangers of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. All these treaties threaten parental rights, homeschool freedom, and US sovereignty. Meetings with Members of House and Senate and their staff to urge them to support the Parental Rights Amendment. It was introduced in the 113th Congress in the House as H.J.Res. 50, and in the Senate as S.J.Res. 37. The Amendment would preserve the right of parents to direct the education, upbringing, and care of their children.

Client expense: $40,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: Education, Dept of, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Opposition to any attempt to ratify the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Opposition to any attempt to ratify the U.N. Convention On the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Opposition to any attempt to ratify the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Held numerous meetings with Senators and their staff to urge them to defeat this treaty. Sent out numerous action alerts urging citizens to contact their senators and urge them to defeat this treaty. All these treaties threaten parental rights, homeschool freedom, and US sovereignty. Meetings with Members of House and Senate and their staff to urge them to support the Parental Rights Amendment. It was been introduced in the House as H.J.Res. 50, in the Senate as S.J.Res. 37. The Amendment would preserve the right of parents to direct the education, upbringing, and care of their children.

Client expense: $40,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Meetings with Members of House and Senate and their staff to urge them to support the Parental Rights Amendment to codify implied parental rights making them explicit in the Constitution. It was been introduced in the House as H.J.Res. 50, in the Senate as S.J.Res. 37. The Amendment would preserve the right of parents to direct the education, upbringing, and care of their children. Urging grassroots calls and emails in support. Opposition to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, a treaty that could threaten parental rights if ratified by the U.S. Senate. Work on articles opposing the treaty, and work to educate Senators and their staff about the dangers of the treaty. Opposition to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, a U.N. treaty that could threaten parental rights of parents with children who have disabilities if ratified by the U.S. Senate. Urging grassroots calls, emails, and letters to ask Senators to oppose this treaty. Drafting articles, memos, and research to use in lobbying against the CRPD. The CRPD would allow UN officials to oversee all decisions regarding children with disabilities under the treaty's use of the "best interests of the child" standard. The treaty would also cede US sovereignty to the UN.

Client expense: $20,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Opposition to any attempt to ratify the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Opposition to any attempt to ratify the U.N. Convention On the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Opposition to any attempt to ratify the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Held numerous meetings with Senators and their staff to urge them to defeat this treaty. Sent out numerous action alerts urging citizens to contact their senators and urge them to defeat this treaty. All these treaties threaten parental rights, homeschool freedom, and US sovereignty. Meetings with Members of House and Senate and their staff to urge them to support the Parental Rights Amendment. It was been introduced in the House as H.J.Res. 50, in the Senate as S.J.Res. 37. The Amendment would preserve the right of parents to direct the education, upbringing, and care of their children.

Client expense: $40,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Meetings with Members of House and Senate and their staff to urge them to support the Parental Rights Amendment to codify implied parental rights making them explicit in the Constitution. It was been introduced in the House as H.J.Res. 50, in the Senate as S.J.Res. 37. The Amendment would preserve the right of parents to direct the education, upbringing, and care of their children. Urging grassroots calls and emails in support. Opposition to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, a treaty that could threaten parental rights if ratified by the U.S. Senate. Work on articles opposing the treaty, and work to educate Senators and their staff about the dangers of the treaty. Opposition to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, a U.N. treaty that could threaten parental rights of parents with children who have disabilities if ratified by the U.S. Senate. Urging grassroots calls, emails, and letters to ask Senators to oppose this treaty. Drafting articles, memos, and research to use in lobbying against the CRPD. The CRPD would allow UN officials to oversee all decisions regarding children with disabilities under the treaty's use of the "best interests of the child" standard. The treaty would also cede US sovereignty to the UN.

Client expense: $40,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Opposition to any attempt to ratify the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Opposition to any attempt to ratify the U.N. Convention On the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Opposition to any attempt to ratify the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Held numerous meetings with Senators and their staff to urge them to defeat this treaty. Sent out numerous action alerts urging citizens to contact their senators and urge them to defeat this treaty. Meetings with Members of House and Senate and their staff to urge them to support the Parental Rights Amendment. It was been introduced in the House as H.J.Res. 50, in the Senate as S.J.Res. 37. The Amendment would preserve the right of parents to direct the education, upbringing, and care of their children. All these treaties threaten parental rights, homeschool freedom, and US sovereignty.

Client expense: $40,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: Education, Dept of, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Contacts in opposition to S. J. Res. 19, a proposal to amend the Constitution to allow Congress or any state legislature to restrict or criminalize communications "to influence elections," i.e. speech to the public about political figures or contentious public policy issues; contacts include letter to Senate offices dated September 3, 2014. (Cloture not invoked on the joint resolution, September 11, 2014.)Contacts in opposition to resolutions endorsing "back from the dead" theory that long-expired 1972 "Equal Rights Amendment" may still be made part of the U.S. Constitution, H.J. Res. 43 and S. J. Res. 15. Contacts in opposition to S.J. Res. 10, proposed "Equal Rights Amendment" to U.S. Constitution, unless the resolution is amended to include "abortion-neutralization amendment." Consultations on "Parental Rights Amendment" (H.J.Res. 50 and S. J. Res. 37); NRLC has no position on these proposals.

Client expense: $106,475 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Meetings with Members of House and Senate and their staff to urge them to support the Parental Rights Amendment to codify implied parental rights making them explicit in the Constitution. It was been introduced in the House as H.J.Res. 50, in the Senate as S.J.Res. 37. The Amendment would preserve the right of parents to direct the education, upbringing, and care of their children. Urging grassroots calls and emails in support.Opposition to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, a treaty that could threaten parental rights if ratified by the U.S. Senate. Work on articles opposing the treaty, and work to educate Senators and their staff about the dangers of the treaty. Opposition to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, a U.N. treaty that could threaten parental rights of parents with children who have disabilities if ratified by the U.S. Senate. Urging grassroots calls, emails, and letters to ask Senators to oppose this treaty. Drafting articles, memos, and research to use in lobbying against the CRPD. The CRPD would allow UN officials to oversee all decisions regarding children with disabilities under the treaty's use of the "best interests of the child" standard. The treaty would also cede US sovereignty to the UN.

Client expense: $40,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Opposition to any attempt to ratify the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Opposition to any attempt to ratify the U.N. Convention On the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimation Against Women. Opposition to any attempt to ratify the U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. All these treaties threaten parental rights, homeschool freedom, and US sovereignty.Meetings with Members of House and Senate and their staff to urge them to support the Parental Rights Amendment. It was been introduced in the House as H.J.Res. 50, in the Senate as S.J.Res. 37. The Amendment would preserve the right of parents to direct the education, upbringing, and care of their children.

Client expense: $40,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: Education, Dept of, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Internal Revenue Service (IRS), SENATE

Contacts in opposition to S. J. Res. 19, a proposal to amend the Constitution to remove from the protection of the First Amendment communications to the public about political figures, and in opposition to expanded substitute amendment adopted by subcommittee on June 18, 2014, to allow Congress and any state legislature to regulate, limit, or criminalize communications deemed to "influence elections," including letters sent to the Senate on May 6, 2014 (against resolution as introduced) and on June 23, 2014 (continued)in opposition to the expanded substitute, which was approved by the full Senate Judiciary Committee on July 10, 2014. Contacts in opposition to resolutions endorsing "back from the dead" theory that long-expired 1972 "Equal Rights Amendment" may still be made part of the U.S. Constitution, H.J. Res. 43 and S. J. Res. 15. Contacts in opposition to S.J. Res. 10, proposed "Equal Rights Amendment" to U.S. Constitution, unless the resolution is amended to include "abortion-neutralization amendment." Consultations on "Parental Rights Amendment" (H.J.Res. 50 and S. J. Res. 37); NRLC has no position on these proposals.

Client expense: $79,421 · Firm income: Not reported

S. J. Res 37, Disapproval Resolution of EPA UMACT Legislation CWA, Section 404 permits Greenhouse Gas Regulation Permitting under CAA Utility MACT Regulation Under CAA

Client expense: $650,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Monitor legislative and federal activity related to global warming and climate change. S. 231, EPA Regulations Suspension Act of 2011. S. 272, EPA Fair Play Act. S 482, Tax Prevention Act of 2011.H.R. 910, Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011. S. 937, American Alternative Fuels Act of 2011. H.R. 457, To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to remove the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to disapprove after a permit has been issued by the Secretary of the Army under section 404 of such Act. H.R. 2036, American Alternative Fuels Act of 2011. S. 1610, Cement Sector Regulatory Relief Act of 2011. H.R. 2681, Cement Sector Regulatory Relief Act of 2011. S. 1183, Comprehensive National Mercury Monitoring Act. S. 1833, Fair Compliance Act of 2011. H.R. 1380, New Alternative Transportation to Give Americans Solutions Act of 2011. H.R. 1405, A bill to prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating coal combustion byproducts as hazardous waste under subtitle C of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, and for other purposes. H.R. 2018, Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011. H.R. 2250, EPA Regulatory Relief Act of 2011. H.R. 2401, Transparency in Regulatory Analysis of Impacts on the Nation Act of 2011. H.AMDT.799 to H.R.2401, Amendment to provide that the Cross State Air Pollution Rule has no legal force or effect, and directs EPA to continue to apply the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) for at least 3 years until after the study in the underlying bill is complete. The amendment also requires that the proposed Utility Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) rule has no legal force and effect and that any subsequent Utility MACT rule be issued no sooner than 1 year after the study in the underlying bill is complete. If reissuing the rule, EPA is required to ensure that MACT standards are achievable in practice and that the compliance period is at least 5 years. S.J Res 37, A joint resolution to disapprove a rule promulgated by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency relating to emission standards for certain steam generating units. H.AMDT.151 to H.R. 1, Amendment prohibits the use of funds to the EPA, the Corps of Engineers, or the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement to carry out, implement, administer, or enforce any policy or procedure set forth in the memorandum issued by the EPA and the Department of the Army entitled "Enhanced Surface Coal Mining Pending Permit Coordination Procedures", dated June 11, 2009, or the guidance issued by the EPA entitled "Improving EPA Review of Appalachian Surface Coal Mining Operations under the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, and the Environmental Justice Executive Order", dated April 1, 2010. H.R. 6172, To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from finalizing any rule imposing any standard of performance for carbon dioxide emissions from any existing or new source that is a fossil fuel-fired electric utility generating unit unless and until carbon capture and storage is found to be technologically and economically feasible. S. 3512, Coal Ash Recycling and Oversight Act of 2012. S. 3382, Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2012 H.R. 3862, Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2012. Congressional outreach regarding BLM leasing policy. Monitor all administrative action at EPA related to coal fired electric generation.

S. J. Res 37, Disapproval Resolution of EPA UMACT Legislation CWA, Section 404 permits Greenhouse Gas Regulation Permitting under CAA Utility MACT Regulation Under CAA

Client expense: $830,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE