A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to balancing the budget.
Legislative Progress
Introduced
February 3, 2021
Latest Action
February 3, 2021
Primary Sponsor
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican(MS)
Momentum (last 30 days)
0
score
0 actions · 0 new cosponsors · 0 votes
Speed vs cohort
0pct
0d open
vs 70 other SJRES bills in the 117th — cohort avg 22d
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment prohibiting total outlays for a fiscal year from exceeding total receipts for that fiscal year unless Congress authorizes the excess by a two-thirds vote of each chamber. The prohibition excludes outlays for repayment of debt principal and receipts derived from borrowing. The amendment prohibits total outlays for any fiscal year from exceeding 18% of the gross domestic product of the United States, unless two-thirds of each chamber of Congress provides for a specific increase above this amount. The amendment requires a two-thirds vote of each chamber of Congress to impose a new tax, increase the statutory rate of any tax, or increase the aggregate amount of revenue. It requires a three-fifths vote of each chamber to increase the limit on the debt of the United States. The President must submit an annual budget in which total outlays do not exceed total receipts and 18% of the gross domestic product of the United States. The amendment prohibits a court from ordering a revenue increase to enforce the requirements. Congress may waive specified requirements when a declaration of war is in effect or the United States is engaged in a military conflict that causes an imminent and serious military threat to national security.
These links require the bill number to appear in the filing's source-reported specific issue text. Client expenses and lobbying-firm income are separate disclosure fields.
Filing registrants (2)
2023 · second_quarter · District of Columbia
H.J.Res.26 / S.J.Res.12, Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022. H.J. Res. 42 / S.J.Res 26, Disapproving the Action of the District of Columbia Council in Approving the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022 H.J. Res. 24 / S.J.Res. 6, Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022 Judicial Nominations Issues related to federal land use Issues related to Home Rule for the District of Columbia
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in Senate
Bills with similar content found using semantic analysis.
Sources: Congress.gov
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $30,000
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2021 · first_quarter · Constitution
Support passage and ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment; support Cardin-Murkowski Resolution a.k.a. SJ Res 6. Work towards passage HJR79.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2021 · first_quarter · Civil Rights/Civil Liberties
Support passage and ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment; support Cardin-Murkowski Resolution a.k.a. SJ Res 6.
Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
| Republican |
| OK |
| Jerry Moran | Republican | KS |
| John Barrasso | Republican | WY |
| John Cornyn | Republican | TX |
| John Hoeven | Republican | ND |
| Joni Ernst | Republican | IA |
| Marco Rubio | Republican | FL |
| Marsha Blackburn | Republican | TN |
| Mike Crapo | Republican | ID |
| Shelley Moore Capito | Republican | WV |
| Thom Tillis | Republican | NC |
| Todd Young | Republican | IN |