Loading…
Unified public record assembled from the source systems listed below. Amounts describe distinct reported activity and are not added into a single influence total.
Political giving
$0
Political receipts
$0
Lobbying income
$23,090,000
Lobbying expense
—
Federal awards
—
Relationships
280
| $370,000 |
| — |
| lobbied by | Sacramento Municipal Utility District | $320,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Sacramento Municipal Utility District | $320,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Sacramento Municipal Utility District | $320,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Sacramento Municipal Utility District | $280,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Sacramento Municipal Utility District | $260,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Sacramento Municipal Utility District | $260,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Goodman Manufacturing Co | $240,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Southern California Public Power Authority | $240,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Sacramento Municipal Utility District | $220,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Nuevo Energy | $220,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Gas Technologies Institute | $220,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Tennessee Valley Public Power Association | $220,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Tennessee Valley Public Power Association | $210,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Colorado River Energy Distributors Association | $210,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Southern California Public Power Authority | $200,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Sacramento Municipal Utility District | $200,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Colorado River Energy Distributors Association | $180,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Southern California Public Power Authority | $170,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Southern California Public Power Authority | $160,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Colorado River Energy Distributors Association | $150,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Tennessee Valley Public Power Association | $150,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Southern California Public Power Authority | $150,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Amarillo Economic Development Corp | $140,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Tennessee Valley Public Power Association | $140,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Sacramento Municipal Utility District | $140,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Southern California Public Power Authority | $140,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Arctic Resources Co | $140,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Southern California Public Power Authority | $130,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Tennessee Valley Public Power Association | $130,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Tennessee Valley Public Power Association | $130,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Southern California Public Power Authority | $130,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Northwest Public Power Association | $120,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Panhandle 2000 | $120,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Tennessee Valley Public Power Association | $120,000 | — |
| lobbied by | City Utilities Of Springfield | $120,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Tennessee Valley Public Power Association | $120,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Tennessee Valley Public Power Association | $120,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Texas A&m Engineering Experiment Station | $120,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Northern California Power Agency | $120,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Northwest Public Power Association | $120,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Transmission Access Policy Study Group | $120,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Turlock Irrigation District | $120,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Tennessee Valley Public Power Association | $120,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Colorado River Energy Distributors Association | $120,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Nuevo Energy | $120,000 | — |
| lobbied by | Panhandle 2000 | $120,000 | — |