Loading…
Lobbying Spend
$10K
Filings
50
Firms Hired
1
Active Period
1999–2013
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
2013 · third_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
Signed onto coalition letter to U.S. Senate urging the adoption of S. Amdt. 1847 to S. 1392.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: S. 1392
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
2013 · third_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
Signed onto coalition letter to U.S. Senate urging members to consider amendment (S. Amdt. 1883) to S. 1392 regarding lead-based paint in commercial properties.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: S. 1392
Energy Efficiency Improvement Act of 2014
2013 · second_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute signed onto a joint coalition letter to House members regarding H.R. 2126 and "Tenant Star."
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 2126
Small Business Lending Enhancement Act of 2011
2012 · second_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute conducted a Capitol Hill Visit on April 18, 2012. One of the issues our members talked with U.S. Representatives and Senators about was the credit union lending cap. We asked for support of H.R. 1418 and S. 2231.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 1418
We signed onto a coalition letter asking for amendments to H.R. 2146 and S. 1789. The American Society of Association Executives (ASAE) spearheaded the coalition.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 2146
SEC Regulatory Accountability Act
2012 · second_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute conducted a Capitol Hill Visit on April 18, 2012. One of the issues our members talked with U.S. Representatives and Senators about was the Financial Accounting Standards Board lease accounting proposal. We asked for support of H.R. 2308 to assess the economic impact of the FASB proposal.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 2308
Marketplace Equity Act of 2011
2012 · second_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute conducted a Capitol Hill Visit on April 18, 2012. One of the issues our members talked with U.S. Representatives and Senators about was internet sales tax. We asked for support of H.R. 3179 and S. 1832.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 3179
United States Covered Bond Act of 2011
2012 · second_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute conducted a Capitol Hill Visit on April 18, 2012. One of the issues our members talked with U.S. Representatives and Senators about was covered bonds. We asked for support of H.R. 940 and S. 1835.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 940
Common Sense Economic Recovery Act of 2011
2011 · third_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
We co-signed a letter with the National Association of REALTORS in response to a hearing on "Legislative Proposals Regarding Bank Examination Practices." The House of Representatives Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit called the hearing. The letter included information about H.R. 1723.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 1723
United States Covered Bond Act of 2011
2011 · second_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute lobbied Congress to support legislation, H.R. 940, that would formally create a covered bonds market in the United States.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 940
CRE Act of 2011
2011 · first_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute submitted a letter to Members of Congress in support of H.R. 1147, "The Community Recovery and Enhancement (CRE) Act". This bill offers tax incentives in order to attract new private equity to commercial real estate.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 1147
Retrofit for Energy and Environmental Performance (REEP) Program Act
2009 · second_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute opposed H.R. 2454, originally titled as "To create clean energy jobs, achieve energy independence, reduce global warming pollution and transition to a clean energy economy." This bill has since been renumbered and renamed as H.R. 2998, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. CCIM Institute supported incentive-based legislation that achieves energy efficiency in buildings and provides financial assistance for retrofits. Additionally, CCIM Institute opposed mandatory labeling, building code development by federal agencies and mandatory retrofitting. CCIM Institute supported H.R. 1778, called the Retrofit for Energy and Environmental Performance (REEP) Program Act, which provides incentives for energy retrofits for buildings.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 1778
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the treatment of partnership interests held by partners providing services.
2009 · second_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute opposed H.R. 1935, titled as "To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the treatment of partnership interests held by partners providing services." The bill proposed to eliminate capital gains treatment for any carried interest of a real estate partnership. Specifically, CCIM Institute supported an exemption for real estate partnerships from this tax treatment.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 1935
American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009
2009 · second_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute opposed H.R. 2454, originally titled as "To create clean energy jobs, achieve energy independence, reduce global warming pollution and transition to a clean energy economy." This bill has since been renumbered and renamed as H.R. 2998, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. CCIM Institute supported incentive-based legislation that achieves energy efficiency in buildings and provides financial assistance for retrofits. Additionally, CCIM Institute opposed mandatory labeling, building code development by federal agencies and mandatory retrofitting. CCIM Institute supported H.R. 1778, called the Retrofit for Energy and Environmental Performance (REEP) Program Act, which provides incentives for energy retrofits for buildings.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 2998
Homeowners' Defense Act of 2007
2008 · second_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute asked Congress to solve the problem of availability and affordability of natural disaster insurance through the creation of a federal reinsurance program that is funded through contributions from insurers or state catastrophic insurance programs. CCIM Institute supported H.R. 3355, the Homeowners Defense Act of 2007 and its companion bill S. 2310; and S. 2286, the Commission on Natural Catastrophe Risk Management and Insurance Act of 2007.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 3355
Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008
2008 · second_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute supported positive incentives for energy conservation activities. The Institute supported energy tax credits and asked Congress to focus on voluntary standards for new construction and existing commercial properties. CCIM Institute supported H.R. 5351, the Renewable Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 5351
Commission on Natural Catastrophe Risk Management and Insurance Act of 2007
2008 · second_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute asked Congress to solve the problem of availability and affordability of natural disaster insurance through the creation of a federal reinsurance program that is funded through contributions from insurers or state catastrophic insurance programs. CCIM Institute supported H.R. 3355, the Homeowners Defense Act of 2007 and its companion bill S. 2310; and S. 2286, the Commission on Natural Catastrophe Risk Management and Insurance Act of 2007.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: S. 2286
Homeowners' Defense Act of 2007
2008 · second_quarter · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute asked Congress to solve the problem of availability and affordability of natural disaster insurance through the creation of a federal reinsurance program that is funded through contributions from insurers or state catastrophic insurance programs. CCIM Institute supported H.R. 3355, the Homeowners Defense Act of 2007 and its companion bill S. 2310; and S. 2286, the Commission on Natural Catastrophe Risk Management and Insurance Act of 2007.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: S. 2310
Airport Emergency Reimbursement Act of 2003
2007 · mid_year · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute supported the Senate provision in the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations bill (HR 1591) that would extend leasehold improvements.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: HR 1591
Community Choice in Real Estate Act
2007 · mid_year · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute supported HR 111 and S 98 which would prevent banks from engaging in real estate management.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: HR 111
Minority Entrepreneurship Development Act of 2007
2007 · mid_year · Firm: INSTITUTE OF REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT
CCIM Institute supported HR 111 and S 98 which would prevent banks from engaging in real estate management.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: S 98
Source: Senate LDA