Loading…
Lobbying Spend
—
Filings
64
Firms Hired
2
Active Period
2010–2024
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
American Health Care Act of 2017
2017 · fourth_quarter · Firm: AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER FELD
Affordable Care Act reforms that do not negatively impact Orange County Medicaid recipients, H.R. 1628; Medicare Dual Special Needs Plans (D-SNPs); Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) reforms.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $30,000
Matched citations: H.R. 1628
American Health Care Act of 2017
2017 · third_quarter · Firm: AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER FELD
Affordable Care Act reforms that do not negatively impact Orange County Medicaid recipients, H.R. 1628; Medicare Dual Special Needs Plans (D-SNPs); Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) reforms.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $30,000
Matched citations: H.R. 1628
American Health Care Act of 2017
2017 · second_quarter · Firm: AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER FELD
Affordable Care Act reforms that do not negatively impact Orange County Medicaid recipients, H.R. 1628; Medicare Dual Special Needs Plans (D-SNPs); Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) reforms.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 1628
American Health Care Act of 2017
2017 · first_quarter · Firm: AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER FELD
Affordable Care Act reforms that do not negatively impact Orange County Medicaid recipients, H.R. 1628.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 1628
Source: Senate LDA