Loading…
Lobbying Spend
—
Filings
47
Firms Hired
2
Active Period
2017–2026
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
US EPA appropriations language related to chemical risk assessments and, towards the same goal, advocacy in support of the No IRIS Act (S.623/H.R.1415).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $60,000
Matched citations: H.R.1415
US EPA appropriations language related to chemical risk assessments and, towards the same goal, advocacy in support of the No IRIS Act (S.623/H.R.1415).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $60,000
Matched citations: S.623
US EPA appropriations language related to chemical risk assessments and, towards the same goal, advocacy in support of the No IRIS Act (S.623/H.R.1415).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: H.R.1415
US EPA appropriations language related to chemical risk assessments and, towards the same goal, advocacy in support of the No IRIS Act (S.623/H.R.1415).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: S.623
US EPA appropriations language related to chemical risk assessments and, towards the same goal, advocacy in support of the No IRIS Act (S.623/H.R.1415).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: H.R.1415
US EPA appropriations language related to chemical risk assessments and, towards the same goal, advocacy in support of the No IRIS Act (S.623/H.R.1415).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: S.623
US EPA appropriations language related to chemical risk assessments and, towards the same goal, advocacy in support of the No IRIS Act (S.623/H.R.1415).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $60,000
Matched citations: H.R.1415
US EPA appropriations language related to chemical risk assessments and, towards the same goal, advocacy in support of the No IRIS Act (S.623/H.R.1415).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $60,000
Matched citations: S.623
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (H.R. 133). EPA Appropriations language related to chemical risk assessments.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: H.R. 133
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021
2020 · fourth_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (H.R. 133). EPA Appropriations language related to chemical risk assessments.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: H.R. 133
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018
2018 · first_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
FY 2018 Omnibus Appropriations (H.R. 1625). EPA Appropriations language related to chemical risk assessments.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: H.R. 1625
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018
2017 · fourth_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
FY 2018 Omnibus Appropriations (H.R. 1625). EPA Appropriations language related to chemical risk assessments.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: H.R. 1625
Source: Senate LDA