Loading…
Lobbying Spend
—
Filings
11
Firms Hired
1
Active Period
2001–2006
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to clarify the definition of "essential fish habitat", and for other purposes.
2006 · mid_year · Firm: SCHMELTZER APTAKER & SHEPARD, P.C.
H.R. 3645 Magnuson-Stevens Act issues, specifically the CDQ program as well as initiatives to redefine a essential fish habitat and rationalize the groundfish fisheries and other fisheries issues, including implementation of Title VIII sections 801-804 (Crab Rationalization) of the fiscal year FY 2004 Omnibus Appropriations Bill.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: H.R. 3645
To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to clarify the definition of "essential fish habitat", and for other purposes.
2006 · mid_year · Firm: SCHMELTZER APTAKER & SHEPARD, P.C.
H.R. 3645 Magnuson-Stevens Act issues, specifically the CDQ program as well as initiatives to redefine a essential fish habitat and rationalize the groundfish fisheries and other fisheries issues, including implementation of Title VIII sections 801-804 (Crab Rationalization) of the fiscal year FY 2004 Omnibus Appropriations Bill.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: H.R. 3645
To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to clarify the definition of "essential fish habitat", and for other purposes.
2006 · mid_year · Firm: SCHMELTZER APTAKER & SHEPARD, P.C.
H.R. 3645 Magnuson-Stevens Act issues, specifically the CDQ program as well as initiatives to redefine a essential fish habitat and rationalize the groundfish fisheries and other fisheries issues, including implementation of Title VIII sections 801-804 (Crab Rationalization) of the fiscal year FY 2004 Omnibus Appropriations Bill.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: H.R. 3645
To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to clarify the definition of "essential fish habitat", and for other purposes.
2005 · year_end · Firm: SCHMELTZER APTAKER & SHEPARD, P.C.
H.R. 3645, Magnuson-Stevens Act issues, specifically the CDQ Program, as well as initiatives to redefine Essential Fish Habitat and rationalize the groundfish fisheries, and other fisheries issues, including implementation of Title VIII, Sections 801-804 (Crab Rationalization) of the FY 2004 Omnibus Appropriations Bill.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: H.R. 3645
To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to clarify the definition of "essential fish habitat", and for other purposes.
2005 · year_end · Firm: SCHMELTZER APTAKER & SHEPARD, P.C.
H.R. 3645, Magnuson-Stevens Act issues, specifically the CDQ Program, as well as initiatives to redefine Essential Fish Habitat and rationalize the groundfish fisheries, and other fisheries issues, including implementation of Title VIII, Sections 801-804 (Crab Rationalization) of the FY 2004 Omnibus Appropriations Bill.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: H.R. 3645
To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to clarify the definition of "essential fish habitat", and for other purposes.
2005 · year_end · Firm: SCHMELTZER APTAKER & SHEPARD, P.C.
H.R. 3645, Magnuson-Stevens Act issues, specifically the CDQ Program, as well as initiatives to redefine Essential Fish Habitat and rationalize the groundfish fisheries, and other fisheries issues, including implementation of Title VIII, Sections 801-804 (Crab Rationalization) of the FY 2004 Omnibus Appropriations Bill.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: H.R. 3645
Source: Senate LDA