Lobbying Spend
—
Filings
83
Firms Hired
2
Active Period
2005–2020
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013
2014 · fourth_quarter · Firm: RICCHETTI INCORPORATED
Issues related to patent reform, specifically technical corrections legislation; Issues related to patent rights of non-practicing entities; Issues related to loser-payes proposals and end-user protection in patent litigation; Issues related to changes to rules governing business method patents; Issues related to transparency provisions, restriction on demand letters and other patent litigation reforms in S. 1720, the Patent Transparency and Improvement Act of 2013.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $75,000
Matched citations: S. 1720
Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013
2014 · third_quarter · Firm: RICCHETTI INCORPORATED
Issues related to patent reform, specifically technical corrections legislation; Issues related to patent rights of non-practicing entities; Issues related to loser-payes proposals and end-user protections in patent litigation; Issues related to changes to rules governing business method patents; Issues related to transparency provisions, restriction on demand letters and other patent litigation reforms in S.1720, the Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $75,000
Matched citations: S.1720
Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013
2014 · second_quarter · Firm: RICCHETTI INCORPORATED
Issues related to patent reform, specifically technical corrections legislation; Issues related to patent rights of non-practicing entities; Issues related to loser-pays proposals and end-user protections in patent litigation; Issues related to changes to rules governing business method patents; Issues related to transparency provision, restrictions on demand letters and other patent litigation reforms in S.1720, the Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $75,000
Matched citations: S.1720
Saving High-Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes Act of 2013
2013 · first_quarter · Firm: PETER HARTER
PL 112-29: (AMERICA INVENTS ACT); PROVISIONS RELATED TO POST- GRANT REVIEW ESTOPPELBILL NUMBER NOT YET ASSIGNED: LEGISLATION REGARDING REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST REQUIREMENTS; ALL PROVISIONS OF THE BILL DISCUSSIONS REGARDING POSSIBLE INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION PATENT REFORM LEGISLATION HR 845: SAVING HIGH-TECH INNOVATORS FROM EGREGIOUS LEGAL DISPUTES ACT OF 2013 (SHIELD ACT); ALL PROVISIONS OF THE BILL
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: HR 845
Saving High-Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes Act of 2012
2012 · fourth_quarter · Firm: PETER HARTER
PL 112-29: (AMERICA INVENTS ACT); PROVISIONS RELATED TO POST- GRANT REVIEW ESTOPPEL BILL NUMBER NOT YET ASSIGNED: ISSUES REGARDING PATENT ASSERTION ENTITY OVERSIGHT BY FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANTITRUST DIVISION HR 6245: SAVING HIGH-TECH INNOVATORS FROM EGREGIOUS LEGAL DISPUTES ACT OF 2012 (SHIELD ACT); PROVISIONS RELATED TO SOFTWARE PATENT LITIGATION REFORM DRAFT PROPOSALS HR 6621: TO CORRECT AND IMPROVE CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE LEAHY-SMITH AMERICA INVENTS ACT AND TITLE 35, UNITED STATES CODE; ALL PROVISIONS OF THE BILL
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: HR 6245
To correct and improve certain provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act and title 35, United States Code.
2012 · fourth_quarter · Firm: PETER HARTER
PL 112-29: (AMERICA INVENTS ACT); PROVISIONS RELATED TO POST- GRANT REVIEW ESTOPPEL BILL NUMBER NOT YET ASSIGNED: ISSUES REGARDING PATENT ASSERTION ENTITY OVERSIGHT BY FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION AND DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANTITRUST DIVISION HR 6245: SAVING HIGH-TECH INNOVATORS FROM EGREGIOUS LEGAL DISPUTES ACT OF 2012 (SHIELD ACT); PROVISIONS RELATED TO SOFTWARE PATENT LITIGATION REFORM DRAFT PROPOSALS HR 6621: TO CORRECT AND IMPROVE CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE LEAHY-SMITH AMERICA INVENTS ACT AND TITLE 35, UNITED STATES CODE; ALL PROVISIONS OF THE BILL
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: HR 6621
Saving High-Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes Act of 2012
2012 · third_quarter · Firm: PETER HARTER
PL 112-29: (AMERICA INVENTS ACT); PROVISIONS RELATED TO ESTOPPEL AND TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS HR 6245: SAVING HIGH-TECH INNOVATORS FROM EGREGIOUS LEGAL DISPUTES ACT OF 2012 (SHIELD ACT); ALL PROVISIONS OF THE BILL S 3486/ HR 6432: PATENT LAW TREATIES IMPLEMENTATION ACT OF 2012; PROVISIONS RELATED TO PATENT LICENSE REGISTRY ISSUES BILL NUMBER NOT YET ASSIGNED: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION LEGISLATION REGARDING NON PRACTICING ENTITIES (NPE), PUBLIC INTEREST TEST, AND STANDARDS ESSENTIAL PATENTS; ALL PROVISIONS OF THE BILL BILL NUMBER NOT YET ASSIGNED: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE FUNDING FOR 2013 FISCAL YEAR; PROVISIONS RELATED TO PATENT LICENSE REGISTRY FEE DIVERSION
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: HR 6245
Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012
2012 · third_quarter · Firm: PETER HARTER
PL 112-29: (AMERICA INVENTS ACT); PROVISIONS RELATED TO ESTOPPEL AND TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS HR 6245: SAVING HIGH-TECH INNOVATORS FROM EGREGIOUS LEGAL DISPUTES ACT OF 2012 (SHIELD ACT); ALL PROVISIONS OF THE BILL S 3486/ HR 6432: PATENT LAW TREATIES IMPLEMENTATION ACT OF 2012; PROVISIONS RELATED TO PATENT LICENSE REGISTRY ISSUES BILL NUMBER NOT YET ASSIGNED: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION LEGISLATION REGARDING NON PRACTICING ENTITIES (NPE), PUBLIC INTEREST TEST, AND STANDARDS ESSENTIAL PATENTS; ALL PROVISIONS OF THE BILL BILL NUMBER NOT YET ASSIGNED: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE FUNDING FOR 2013 FISCAL YEAR; PROVISIONS RELATED TO PATENT LICENSE REGISTRY FEE DIVERSION
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: HR 6432
HR 1260/S 515: PATENT REFORM ACT OF 2009; ALL PROVISIONS OF THE BILL
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: HR 1260
Nuclear Energy Research and Development Act of 2010
2010 · fourth_quarter · Firm: PETER HARTER
HR 5866: NUCLEAR ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2010; PROVISIONS RELATED TO FAST REACTORS DISCUSSIONS REGARDING RUSSIA 123 TREATY
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: HR 5866
HR 1260/S 515: PATENT REFORM ACT OF 2009; ALL PROVISIONS OF THE BILL
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: S 515
HR 1260/S 515: PATENT REFORM ACT OF 2009; ALL PROVISIONS OF THE BILL
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: HR 1260
Nuclear Energy Research and Development Act of 2010
2010 · third_quarter · Firm: PETER HARTER
HR 5866: NUCLEAR ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2010; PROVISIONS RELATED TO FAST REACTORS
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: HR 5866
HR 1260/S 515: PATENT REFORM ACT OF 2009; ALL PROVISIONS OF THE BILL
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: S 515
HR 1260/S 515: PATENT REFORM ACT OF 2009; PROVISIONS RELATED TO DAMAGES, POST-GRANT REVIEW, INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS OF MARKMAN RULINGS, SECTION 102 PREAMBLE BURDEN SHIFTING, FEE DIVERSION, FIRST-TO-FILE, AND SECTION 251
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: HR 1260
HR 1260/S 515: PATENT REFORM ACT OF 2009; PROVISIONS RELATED TO DAMAGES, POST-GRANT REVIEW, INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS OF MARKMAN RULINGS, SECTION 102 PREAMBLE BURDEN SHIFTING, FEE DIVERSION, FIRST-TO-FILE, AND SECTION 251
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: S 515
Incorporation Transparency and Law Enforcement Assistance Act
2010 · second_quarter · Firm: PETER HARTER
S. 569: INCORPORATION TRANSPARENCY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ACT; PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE FORMATION AND MANAGEMENT OF LLC's; PROVISIONS IN THE COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REFORM LEGISLATION CONCERNING CARRIED INTEREST AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ANGEL INVESTORS
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: S. 569
HR 1260/S 515: PATENT REFORM ACT OF 2009; PROVISIONS RELATED TO DAMAGES, POST-GRANT REVIEW, INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS OF MARKMAN RULINGS, SECTION 102 PREAMBLE BURDEN SHIFTING, AND FEE DIVERSION
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: HR 1260
HR 1260/S 515: PATENT REFORM ACT OF 2009; PROVISIONS RELATED TO DAMAGES, POST-GRANT REVIEW, INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS OF MARKMAN RULINGS, SECTION 102 PREAMBLE BURDEN SHIFTING, AND FEE DIVERSION
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: S 515
Incorporation Transparency and Law Enforcement Assistance Act
2010 · first_quarter · Firm: PETER HARTER
S. 569: INCORPORATION TRANSPARENCY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ACT; PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE FORMATION AND MANAGEMENT OF LLCS
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: S. 569
HR 1260/S 515: PATENT REFORM ACT OF 2009; PROVISIONS RELATED TO DAMAGES, POST-GRANT REVIEW, INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS OF MARKMAN RULINGS, SECTION 102 PREAMBLE BURDEN SHIFTING, AND FEE DIVERSION
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: HR 1260
HR 1260/S 515: PATENT REFORM ACT OF 2009; PROVISIONS RELATED TO DAMAGES, POST-GRANT REVIEW, INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS OF MARKMAN RULINGS, SECTION 102 PREAMBLE BURDEN SHIFTING, AND FEE DIVERSION
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: S 515
Incorporation Transparency and Law Enforcement Assistance Act
2009 · fourth_quarter · Firm: PETER HARTER
S. 569: INCORPORATION TRANSPARENCY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ACT; PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE FORMATION AND MANAGEMENT OF LLCS
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: S. 569
HR 1260/S 515: PATENT REFORM ACT OF 2009; PROVISIONS RELATED TO DAMAGES, POST-GRANT REVIEW, INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS OF MARKMAN RULINGS, SECTION 102 PREAMBLE BURDEN SHIFTING, AND FEE DIVERSION
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: HR 1260
HR 1260/S 515: PATENT REFORM ACT OF 2009; PROVISIONS RELATED TO DAMAGES, POST-GRANT REVIEW, INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS OF MARKMAN RULINGS, SECTION 102 PREAMBLE BURDEN SHIFTING, AND FEE DIVERSION
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: S 515
Source: Senate LDA