Loading…
Lobbying Spend
—
Filings
44
Firms Hired
2
Active Period
2006–2017
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic or modoacrylic staple fibers, not carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning.
2010 · fourth_quarter · Firm: MCKENNA, LONG & ALDRIDGE
issues regarding animal welfare; impact of food safety legislation on pet food products; HR 5092 to prohibit animal crush videos.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: HR 5092
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic or modoacrylic staple fibers, not carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning.
2010 · third_quarter · Firm: MCKENNA, LONG & ALDRIDGE
issues regarding animal welfare; impact of food safety legislation on pet food products; HR 5092 to prohibit animal crush videos.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: HR 5092
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic or modoacrylic staple fibers, not carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning.
2010 · second_quarter · Firm: MCKENNA, LONG & ALDRIDGE
issues regarding animal welfare; impact of food safety legislation on pet food products; HR 5092 to prohibit animal crush videos.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: HR 5092
Source: Senate LDA