Loading…
Lobbying Income
$5.6M
Filings
251
Unique Clients
5
Active Period
2005–2022
Registrant-reported income from clients on LDA filings
Largest clients by registrant-reported income
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
Common Sense Indian Gambling Reform Act of 2005
2006 · year_end · Client: ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
Issues, proposed regulations, and legislation affecting Indian nations, including tribal gaming, Native American sovereign immunity, tribal consultation, proposed land claims, and out-of-state tribal recognition, including but not limited to HR 4893, S. 2078, S. 1260, S. 1518, HR 2353, HR 3431
Client expense: — · Firm income: $180,000
Matched citations: S. 1260
Common Sense Indian Gambling Reform Act of 2005
2006 · year_end · Client: ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
Issues, proposed regulations, and legislation affecting Indian nations, including tribal gaming, Native American sovereignty, tribal consultation, proposed land claims, and out-of-state tribal recognition, including but not limited to HR 4893, S. 2078, S. 1260, S. 1518, HR 2353, HR 3431.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $180,000
Matched citations: S. 1260
Common Sense Indian Gambling Reform Act of 2005
2006 · year_end · Client: ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
Issues, proposed regulations and legislation affecting Indian nations, including Indian gaming, Native American sovereign immunity, tribal consultation, proposed land claims, and out of state tribal recognition, including, but not limited to, HR 4893, S. 2078, S. 1260, S. 1518, HR 2353, HR 3431.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $180,000
Matched citations: S. 1260
Common Sense Indian Gambling Reform Act of 2005
2006 · year_end · Client: ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
Issues, proposed regulations, and legislation affecting Indian nations, including tribal gaming, Native American sovereign immunity, tribal consultation, proposed land claims, and out-of-state tribal recognition, including but not limited to HR 4893, S. 2078, S. 1260, S. 1518, HR 2353, HR 3431
Client expense: — · Firm income: $180,000
Matched citations: S. 1260
A bill to amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to modify a provision relating to the locations in which class III gaming is lawful.
2006 · year_end · Client: ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
Issues, proposed regulations, and legislation affecting Indian nations, including tribal gaming, Native American sovereign immunity, tribal consultation, proposed land claims, and out-of-state tribal recognition, including but not limited to HR 4893, S. 2078, S. 1260, S. 1518, HR 2353, HR 3431
Client expense: — · Firm income: $180,000
Matched citations: S. 1518
A bill to amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to modify a provision relating to the locations in which class III gaming is lawful.
2006 · year_end · Client: ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
Issues, proposed regulations, and legislation affecting Indian nations, including tribal gaming, Native American sovereignty, tribal consultation, proposed land claims, and out-of-state tribal recognition, including but not limited to HR 4893, S. 2078, S. 1260, S. 1518, HR 2353, HR 3431.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $180,000
Matched citations: S. 1518
A bill to amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to modify a provision relating to the locations in which class III gaming is lawful.
2006 · year_end · Client: ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
Issues, proposed regulations and legislation affecting Indian nations, including Indian gaming, Native American sovereign immunity, tribal consultation, proposed land claims, and out of state tribal recognition, including, but not limited to, HR 4893, S. 2078, S. 1260, S. 1518, HR 2353, HR 3431.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $180,000
Matched citations: S. 1518
A bill to amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to modify a provision relating to the locations in which class III gaming is lawful.
2006 · year_end · Client: ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
Issues, proposed regulations, and legislation affecting Indian nations, including tribal gaming, Native American sovereign immunity, tribal consultation, proposed land claims, and out-of-state tribal recognition, including but not limited to HR 4893, S. 2078, S. 1260, S. 1518, HR 2353, HR 3431
Client expense: — · Firm income: $180,000
Matched citations: S. 1518
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Amendments of 2006
2006 · year_end · Client: ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
Issues, proposed regulations, and legislation affecting Indian nations, including tribal gaming, Native American sovereign immunity, tribal consultation, proposed land claims, and out-of-state tribal recognition, including but not limited to HR 4893, S. 2078, S. 1260, S. 1518, HR 2353, HR 3431
Client expense: — · Firm income: $180,000
Matched citations: S. 2078
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Amendments of 2006
2006 · year_end · Client: ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
Issues, proposed regulations, and legislation affecting Indian nations, including tribal gaming, Native American sovereignty, tribal consultation, proposed land claims, and out-of-state tribal recognition, including but not limited to HR 4893, S. 2078, S. 1260, S. 1518, HR 2353, HR 3431.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $180,000
Matched citations: S. 2078
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Amendments of 2006
2006 · year_end · Client: ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
Issues, proposed regulations and legislation affecting Indian nations, including Indian gaming, Native American sovereign immunity, tribal consultation, proposed land claims, and out of state tribal recognition, including, but not limited to, HR 4893, S. 2078, S. 1260, S. 1518, HR 2353, HR 3431.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $180,000
Matched citations: S. 2078
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Amendments of 2006
2006 · year_end · Client: ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
Issues, proposed regulations, and legislation affecting Indian nations, including tribal gaming, Native American sovereign immunity, tribal consultation, proposed land claims, and out-of-state tribal recognition, including but not limited to HR 4893, S. 2078, S. 1260, S. 1518, HR 2353, HR 3431
Client expense: — · Firm income: $180,000
Matched citations: S. 2078
Source: Senate LDA