Loading…
Lobbying Spend
—
Filings
5
Firms Hired
1
Active Period
2004–2006
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
American Community Renewal Act of 2002
2006 · year_end · Firm: VAN NESS FELDMAN, LLP
Concerning FERC regulation of a hydroelectric facility in South Dakota; S.1577, To facilitate the transfer of Spearfish Hydroelectric Plant Number 1 H.R.5566, to facilitate the transfer of Spearfish Hydroelectric Plant Number 1
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: H.R.5566
American Community Renewal Act of 2002
2006 · year_end · Firm: VAN NESS FELDMAN, LLP
Concerning FERC regulation of a hydroelectric facility in South Dakota; S.1577, To facilitate the transfer of Spearfish Hydroelectric Plant Number 1 H.R.5566, to facilitate the transfer of Spearfish Hydroelectric Plant Number 1
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: H.R.5566
A bill to facilitate the transfer of Spearfish Hydroelectric Plant Number 1 to the city of Spearfish, South Dakota, and for other purposes.
2006 · year_end · Firm: VAN NESS FELDMAN, LLP
Concerning FERC regulation of a hydroelectric facility in South Dakota; S.1577, To facilitate the transfer of Spearfish Hydroelectric Plant Number 1 H.R.5566, to facilitate the transfer of Spearfish Hydroelectric Plant Number 1
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: S.1577
A bill to facilitate the transfer of Spearfish Hydroelectric Plant Number 1 to the city of Spearfish, South Dakota, and for other purposes.
2006 · year_end · Firm: VAN NESS FELDMAN, LLP
Concerning FERC regulation of a hydroelectric facility in South Dakota; S.1577, To facilitate the transfer of Spearfish Hydroelectric Plant Number 1 H.R.5566, to facilitate the transfer of Spearfish Hydroelectric Plant Number 1
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: S.1577
Source: Senate LDA