WILLIAMS JANOV & COONEY

Lobbying Income

$200K

Filings

Unique Clients

Active Period

1999–2002

Lobbying Income by Year

Registrant-reported income from clients on LDA filings

Year	Lobbying Income	Filings	Clients
2002	$0	8	8
2001	$60,000	29	15
2000	$100,000	16	10
1999	$40,000	17	11

Largest clients by registrant-reported income

Client	Reported Income	Filings	Period
ZUNI INDIAN TRIBE	$60,000	5	1999–2002
PUEBLO OF SAN FELIPE	$40,000	4	2000–2001
BIG PINE PAIUTE TRIBE OF THE OWENS VALLEY	$20,000	5	1999–2002
LONE PINE PAIUTE-SHOSHONE RESERVATION	$20,000	5	1999–2001
EASTERN SHOSHONE TRIBE	$20,000	6	1999–2002
BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE	$20,000	5	1999–2001
PUEBLO OF SANDIA	$20,000	3	1999–2001
PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION	$0	4	1999–2002
COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES	$0	3	2001–2002
CAMPO BAND OF MISSIONS INDIANS	$0	5	1999–2002
PUEBLO OF TESUQUE	$0	6	1999–2001
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION	$0	4	2001
CONFEDERATED TRIBES & BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION	$0	6	1999–2001
HULAPAI NATION	$0	3	2001–2002
LUMMI NATION	$0	6	1999–2002

Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings

Most frequently reported lobbying issues

Issue Code	Description	Reports
Indian/Native American Affairs	Indian/Native American Affairs	63

WILLIAMS JANOV & COONEY — Lobbying Disclosure | Poliscope