Loading…
Lobbying Spend
—
Filings
8
Firms Hired
1
Active Period
2023–2026
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth; Notice of Decision".
2026 · third_quarter · Firm: BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS
S.J.Res. 209;H.J.Res.210. Advocacy relating to vessel emissions policy at U.S. ports.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: H.J.Res.210
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth; Notice of Decision".
2026 · third_quarter · Firm: BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS
S.J.Res. 209;H.J.Res.210. Advocacy relating to vessel emissions policy at U.S. ports.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: H.J.Res.210
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth; Notice of Decision".
2026 · third_quarter · Firm: BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS
S.J.Res. 209;H.J.Res.210. Advocacy relating to vessel emissions policy at U.S. ports.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: S.J.Res. 209
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth; Notice of Decision".
2026 · third_quarter · Firm: BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS
S.J.Res. 209;H.J.Res.210. Advocacy relating to vessel emissions policy at U.S. ports.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: S.J.Res. 209
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth; Notice of Decision".
2026 · third_quarter · Firm: BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS
Specific issues are H.J.Res. 210 and S.J.Res. 209.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: H.J.Res. 210
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth; Notice of Decision".
2026 · third_quarter · Firm: BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS
Specific issues are H.J.Res. 210 and S.J.Res. 209.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: H.J.Res. 210
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth; Notice of Decision".
2026 · third_quarter · Firm: BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS
Specific issues are H.J.Res. 210 and S.J.Res. 209.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S.J.Res. 209
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth; Notice of Decision".
2026 · third_quarter · Firm: BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS
Specific issues are H.J.Res. 210 and S.J.Res. 209.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S.J.Res. 209
Source: Senate LDA