Loading…
Lobbying Spend
—
Filings
7
Firms Hired
1
Active Period
1999–2003
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
Implementation of medical device laws (H.R. 3580). Activities related to the medical device regulatory authority of the United States Food and Drug Administration
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: H.R. 3580
Implementation of medical device laws (H.R. 3580). Activities related to the medical device regulatory authority of the United States Food and Drug Administration
Client expense: — · Firm income: $60,000
Matched citations: H.R. 3580
Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002
2002 · mid_year · Firm: HALE & DORR
Implementation of medical device laws (H.R. 3580). Activities related to the medical device regulatory authority of the United States Food and Drug Administration
Client expense: — · Firm income: $100,000
Matched citations: H.R. 3580
Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002
2001 · year_end · Firm: HALE & DORR
Implementation of medical device laws (H.R. 3580) and medical device user fees. Activities related to the medical device regulatory authority of the United States Food and Drug Administration
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: H.R. 3580
Implementation of medical device laws (S. 1477 and H.R. 3210) Activities related to the medical device regulatory authority of the United States Food and Drug Administration
Client expense: — · Firm income: $100,000
Matched citations: H.R. 3210
A bill to provide for an election of an annuity under section 377 of title 28, United States Code, for any qualified magistrate judge.
2001 · mid_year · Firm: HALE & DORR
Implementation of medical device laws (S. 1477 and H.R. 3210) Activities related to the medical device regulatory authority of the United States Food and Drug Administration
Client expense: — · Firm income: $100,000
Matched citations: S. 1477
Source: Senate LDA