Lobbying Spend
—
Filings
9
Firms Hired
1
Active Period
2010–2011
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
Crime Victim Restitution and Court Fee Intercept Act
2011 · second_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
Support for Crime Victim Restitution and Court Investment Act (S. 755/H.R 1416): provisions related to judicial debt collection.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: H.R 1416
Crime Victim Restitution and Court Fee Intercept Act
2011 · first_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
S 755/HR 1416, Crime Victim Restitution and Court Investment Act: provisions related to judicial debt collection.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: HR 1416
Crime Victim Restitution and Court Fee Intercept Act
2010 · fourth_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
S 3989/HR 1956, Crime Victim Restitution and Court Investment Act: provisions related to judicial debt collection.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: HR 1956
State Court Interpreter Grant Program Act
2010 · fourth_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
Court case management and law enforcement information-sharing technology initiatives. S. 1329, State Court Interpreter Grant Program, all provisions. Issues related to justice-related competitive grant applications.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: S. 1329
Child Support Protection Act of 2009
2010 · fourth_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
Title IV-E and youth services case management technology funding options. S. 1859, Child Support Protection Act.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: S. 1859
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow an offset against income tax refunds to pay for restitution and other State judicial debts that are past-due.
2010 · fourth_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
S 3989/HR 1956, Crime Victim Restitution and Court Investment Act: provisions related to judicial debt collection.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: S 3989
Crime Victim Restitution and Court Fee Intercept Act
2010 · third_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
HR 1956, Crime Victim Restitution and Court Investment Act: provisions related to judicial debt collection.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: HR 1956
State Court Interpreter Grant Program Act
2010 · third_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
Court case management and law enforcement information-sharing technology initiatives. S. 1329, State Court Interpreter Grant Program, all provisions. Issues related to justice-related competitive grant applications, e.g. re-entry programs and legal ssistance to low-income individuals.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: S. 1329
Child Support Protection Act of 2009
2010 · third_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
Title IV-E and youth services case management technology funding options. S. 1859, Child Support Protection Act.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: S. 1859
Crime Victim Restitution and Court Fee Intercept Act
2010 · second_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
HR 1956, Crime Victim Restitution and Court Investment Act: provisions related to judicial debt collection.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: HR 1956
State Court Interpreter Grant Program Act
2010 · second_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
S. 1329, State Court Interpreter Grant Program, all provisions. Federal law enforcement information-sharing technology initiatives. Support for justice-related competitive grant applications, e.g. re-entry programs and legal ssistance to low-income individuals.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: S. 1329
Child Support Protection Act of 2009
2010 · second_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
Title IV-E retroactive reinvestment regulatory standards. S. 1859, Child Support Protection Act.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: S. 1859
Crime Victim Restitution and Court Fee Intercept Act
2010 · first_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
HR 1956, Crime Victim Restitution and Court Investment Act: provisions related to judicial debt collection.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: HR 1956
State Court Interpreter Grant Program Act
2010 · first_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
S. 1329, State Court interpreter. Justice Corps project. Federal law enforcement information-sharing technology initiatives.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: S. 1329
A bill to suspend temporarily the duty on medium molecular weight solid epoxy resin.
2010 · first_quarter · Firm: SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS
Title IV-E retroactive reinvestment regulatory standards. S. 1958, Child Support Protection Act.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: S. 1958
Source: Senate LDA