Loading…
Lobbying Spend
—
Filings
9
Firms Hired
1
Active Period
2016–2017
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
Opposition to PennEast pipeline application (pending at FERC), and improvements to Federal oversight and management of natural gas pipelines approval process. Support for HR 2649 and similar efforts to reform FERC pipeline approvals processes to better protect environment and public interest/need considerations. Limit bad language/legislation in these topic areas in pending comprehensive energy legislation in the House and Senate or independent bills potentially moving separately from comprehensive energy legislation, such as HR 2910.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: HR 2649
Promoting Interagency Coordination for Review of Natural Gas Pipelines Act
2017 · fourth_quarter · Firm: GREEN CAPITOL LLC
Opposition to PennEast pipeline application (pending at FERC), and improvements to Federal oversight and management of natural gas pipelines approval process. Support for HR 2649 and similar efforts to reform FERC pipeline approvals processes to better protect environment and public interest/need considerations. Limit bad language/legislation in these topic areas in pending comprehensive energy legislation in the House and Senate or independent bills potentially moving separately from comprehensive energy legislation, such as HR 2910.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: HR 2910
Opposition to PennEast pipeline application (pending at FERC), and improvements to Federal oversight and management of natural gas pipelines approval process. Support for HR 2649 and similar efforts to reform FERC pipeline approvals processes to better protect environment and public interest/need considerations. Limit bad language/legislation in these topic areas in pending comprehensive energy legislation in the House and Senate or independent bills potentially moving separately from comprehensive energy legislation, such as HR 2910.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: HR 2649
Promoting Interagency Coordination for Review of Natural Gas Pipelines Act
2017 · third_quarter · Firm: GREEN CAPITOL LLC
Opposition to PennEast pipeline application (pending at FERC), and improvements to Federal oversight and management of natural gas pipelines approval process. Support for HR 2649 and similar efforts to reform FERC pipeline approvals processes to better protect environment and public interest/need considerations. Limit bad language/legislation in these topic areas in pending comprehensive energy legislation in the House and Senate or independent bills potentially moving separately from comprehensive energy legislation, such as HR 2910.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: HR 2910
Opposition to PennEast pipeline application at FERC, and improvements to Federal oversight and management of natural gas pipelines approval process. Support for HR 2649 and similar efforts to reform FERC pipeline approvals processes to better protect environment and public interest considerations. Limit bad language/legislation in these topic areas in pending comprehensive energy legislation in the House and Senate or independent bills potentially moving separately from comprehensive energy legislation, such as HR 2910.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: HR 2649
Promoting Interagency Coordination for Review of Natural Gas Pipelines Act
2017 · second_quarter · Firm: GREEN CAPITOL LLC
Opposition to PennEast pipeline application at FERC, and improvements to Federal oversight and management of natural gas pipelines approval process. Support for HR 2649 and similar efforts to reform FERC pipeline approvals processes to better protect environment and public interest considerations. Limit bad language/legislation in these topic areas in pending comprehensive energy legislation in the House and Senate or independent bills potentially moving separately from comprehensive energy legislation, such as HR 2910.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: HR 2910
Raising concerns with respect to PennEast Gas Pipeline application pending before FERC. Opposition to HR 3021. Support for new FERC reform legislation, HR 5630.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: HR 3021
Safe and Accountable Federal Energy Review for Pipelines Act of 2016
2016 · fourth_quarter · Firm: GREEN CAPITOL LLC
Raising concerns with respect to PennEast Gas Pipeline application pending before FERC. Opposition to HR 3021. Support for new FERC reform legislation, HR 5630.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: HR 5630
Raising concerns with respect to PennEast Gas Pipeline application pending before FERC. Opposition to HR 3021. Support for new FERC reform legislation, HR 5630.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: HR 3021
Safe and Accountable Federal Energy Review for Pipelines Act of 2016
2016 · third_quarter · Firm: GREEN CAPITOL LLC
Raising concerns with respect to PennEast Gas Pipeline application pending before FERC. Opposition to HR 3021. Support for new FERC reform legislation, HR 5630.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: HR 5630
Raising concerns with respect to PennEast Gas Pipeline application pending before FERC. Opposition to HR 3021. Support for new FERC reform legislation, HR 5630.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: HR 3021
Safe and Accountable Federal Energy Review for Pipelines Act of 2016
2016 · second_quarter · Firm: GREEN CAPITOL LLC
Raising concerns with respect to PennEast Gas Pipeline application pending before FERC. Opposition to HR 3021. Support for new FERC reform legislation, HR 5630.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: HR 5630
Raising concerns with respect to PennEast Gas Pipeline application pending before FERC. Opposition to HR 3021.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: HR 3021
Working to help ensure National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) considerations are taken into full account, along with other relevant environmental statutes/regulations with regard to nat gas pipeline proposals for the New Jersey/Northeast region, including PennEast. Opposition to aerial siting legislation, such as HR 3021.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 3021
Source: Senate LDA