Loading…
Lobbying Spend
—
Filings
10
Firms Hired
1
Active Period
2021–2023
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act
2022 · fourth_quarter · Firm: BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
Outreach on behalf of California Joint Powers Authorities relating to state-supported Amtrak route issues and post-implementation issues from H.R. 3684 (P.L. 117-58) regarding Amtrak business segments, cost allocation and Board of Director transparency. Outreach related to state funding awards and service updates for intercity rail services (no bill number).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 3684
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act
2022 · third_quarter · Firm: BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
Outreach on behalf of California Joint Powers Authorities relating to state-supported Amtrak route issues and post-implementation issues from H.R. 3684 (P.L. 117-58) regarding Amtrak business segments. Outreach to Members of Congress regarding potential intercity railroad services impacts resulting from a freight railroad work stoppage and environmental track stabilization issues in southern California (no bill number). Issues related to the classification of certain state railroad sponsors as railway carriers (no bill number). Outreach related to state funding awards for intercity rail services (no bill number).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 3684
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act
2022 · second_quarter · Firm: BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
Outreach on behalf of California Joint Powers Authorities relating to state-supported Amtrak route issues and post-implementation issues from H.R. 3684 (P.L. 117-58) regarding Amtrak business segments. Outreach to Members of Congress and Administration related to Federal Railroad Administrations Request for Information (RFI) 87 FR 6938. Outreach/introductions to Surface Transportation Board.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 3684
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act
2022 · first_quarter · Firm: BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
Outreach on behalf of California Joint Powers Authorities relating to state-supported Amtrak route issues (H.R. 3684/S. 2016). Post-implementation issues from H.R. 3684 (P.L. 109-59) regarding Amtrak business segments. Testimony before U.S. House Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 3684
Surface Transportation Investment Act of 2021
2022 · first_quarter · Firm: BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
Outreach on behalf of California Joint Powers Authorities relating to state-supported Amtrak route issues (H.R. 3684/S. 2016). Post-implementation issues from H.R. 3684 (P.L. 109-59) regarding Amtrak business segments. Testimony before U.S. House Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: S. 2016
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act
2021 · fourth_quarter · Firm: BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
Outreach on behalf of California Joint Powers Authorities relating to state-supported Amtrak route issues (H.R. 3684/S. 2016). Post-implementation issues from H.R. 3684 (P.L. 109-59) regarding Amtrak business segments. Testimony before U.S. House Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 3684
Surface Transportation Investment Act of 2021
2021 · fourth_quarter · Firm: BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
Outreach on behalf of California Joint Powers Authorities relating to state-supported Amtrak route issues (H.R. 3684/S. 2016). Post-implementation issues from H.R. 3684 (P.L. 109-59) regarding Amtrak business segments. Testimony before U.S. House Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: S. 2016
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act
2021 · fourth_quarter · Firm: BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
Outreach on behalf of California Joint Powers Authorities relating to state-supported Amtrak route issues (H.R. 3684/S. 2016). Post-implementation issues from H.R. 3684 (P.L. 109-59) regarding Amtrak business segments. Testimony before U.S. House Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 3684
Surface Transportation Investment Act of 2021
2021 · fourth_quarter · Firm: BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
Outreach on behalf of California Joint Powers Authorities relating to state-supported Amtrak route issues (H.R. 3684/S. 2016). Post-implementation issues from H.R. 3684 (P.L. 109-59) regarding Amtrak business segments. Testimony before U.S. House Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: S. 2016
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act
2021 · third_quarter · Firm: BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
Outreach on behalf of California Joint Powers Authorities relating to state-supported Amtrak route issues (H.R. 3684/S. 2016). Support for the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act before surface transportation program expiration (H.R. 3684).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: H.R. 3684
Surface Transportation Investment Act of 2021
2021 · third_quarter · Firm: BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
Outreach on behalf of California Joint Powers Authorities relating to state-supported Amtrak route issues (H.R. 3684/S. 2016). Support for the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act before surface transportation program expiration (H.R. 3684).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000
Matched citations: S. 2016
Source: Senate LDA