Lobbying Spend
—
Filings
18
Firms Hired
1
Active Period
2022–2026
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
Issues related to Section 48D of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 107 of the Chips and Science Act; S. 1642 and H.R. 6055 (Strengthening Essential Manufacturing and Industrial Investment Act).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $100,000
Matched citations: H.R. 6055
Issues related to Section 48D of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 107 of the Chips and Science Act; S. 1642 and H.R. 6055 (Strengthening Essential Manufacturing and Industrial Investment Act).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $100,000
Matched citations: S. 1642
Issues related to Section 48D of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 107 of the Chips and Science Act; S. 1642 and H.R. 6055 (Strengthening Essential Manufacturing and Industrial Investment Act).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $110,000
Matched citations: H.R. 6055
Issues related to Section 48D of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 107 of the Chips and Science Act; S. 1642 and H.R. 6055 (Strengthening Essential Manufacturing and Industrial Investment Act).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $110,000
Matched citations: S. 1642
Issues related to Section 48D of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 107 of the Chips and Science Act; S. 1642 and H.R. 6055 (Strengthening Essential Manufacturing and Industrial Investment Act).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $120,000
Matched citations: H.R. 6055
Issues related to Section 48D of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 107 of the Chips and Science Act; S. 1642 and H.R. 6055 (Strengthening Essential Manufacturing and Industrial Investment Act).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $120,000
Matched citations: S. 1642
An act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.
2025 · fourth_quarter · Firm: HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP
Issues related to Section 48D of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 107 of the Chips and Science Act; S. 1642 (Strengthening Essential Manufacturing and Industrial Investment Act); H.R. 1 - One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $120,000
Matched citations: H.R. 1
Issues related to Section 48D of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 107 of the Chips and Science Act; S. 1642 (Strengthening Essential Manufacturing and Industrial Investment Act); H.R. 1 - One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $120,000
Matched citations: S. 1642
An act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.
2025 · third_quarter · Firm: HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP
Issues related to Section 48D of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 107 of the Chips and Science Act; S. 1642 (Strengthening Essential Manufacturing and Industrial Investment Act); H.R. 1 - One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $110,000
Matched citations: H.R. 1
Issues related to Section 48D of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 107 of the Chips and Science Act; S. 1642 (Strengthening Essential Manufacturing and Industrial Investment Act); H.R. 1 - One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $110,000
Matched citations: S. 1642
An act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.
2025 · second_quarter · Firm: HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP
Issues related to Section 48D of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 107 of the Chips and Science Act; S. 1642 (Strengthening Essential Manufacturing and Industrial Investment Act); H.R. 1 - One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: H.R. 1
Issues related to Section 48D of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 107 of the Chips and Science Act; S. 1642 (Strengthening Essential Manufacturing and Industrial Investment Act); H.R. 1 - One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $50,000
Matched citations: S. 1642
Source: Senate LDA