Loading…
How to read the money
Income and expense are whole-filing amounts associated with this lobbyist, not personal compensation or an allocated share.
No topic inference: each bill number appears in source LDA issue text assigned to this lobbyist.
STRONGER Patents Act of 2017
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017
STRONGER Patents Act of 2017
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017
Specific issues are shown only where the LDA source assigned them to this lobbyist. Targets apply to the associated filing.
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC via INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
2017 · second_quarter · 2A
Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017
Filing targets: Executive Office of the President (EOP), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC via INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
2017 · second_quarter · Q2
Source: Senate LDA
Innovation Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Innovation Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Innovation Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Innovation Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
PATENT Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
PATENT Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
PATENT Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
PATENT Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Venue Equity and Non-Uniformity Elimination Act of 2016
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Venue Equity and Non-Uniformity Elimination Act of 2016
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Venue Equity and Non-Uniformity Elimination Act of 2016
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Venue Equity and Non-Uniformity Elimination Act of 2016
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
STRONG Patents Act of 2015
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
STRONG Patents Act of 2015
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
STRONG Patents Act of 2015
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
STRONG Patents Act of 2015
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Innovation Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Innovation Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection FTC 6(b) Patent Assertion Entity Activity Study
Innovation Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection FTC 6(b) Patent Assertion Entity Activity Study
Innovation Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
PATENT Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
PATENT Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
STRONG Patents Act of 2015
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
STRONG Patents Act of 2015
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection FTC 6(b) Patent Assertion Entity Activity Study
STRONG Patents Act of 2015
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
STRONG Patents Act of 2015
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection FTC 6(b) Patent Assertion Entity Activity Study
Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review;customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; H.R. ____, Targeting Rogue and Opaque Letters Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review;customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; H.R. ____, Targeting Rogue and Opaque Letters Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act;Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; H.R. ____, Targeting Rogue and Opaque Letters Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act;Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review;customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; H.R. ____, Targeting Rogue and Opaque Letters Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act
Client: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC · Firm: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review;customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017
Filing targets: Executive Office of the President (EOP), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC via INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
2017 · first_quarter · Q1
Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation
Filing targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC via INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
2016 · fourth_quarter · Q4
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Filing targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC via INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
2016 · third_quarter · Q3
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Filing targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC via INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
2016 · second_quarter · Q2
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Filing targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC via INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
2016 · first_quarter · Q1
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Filing targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC via INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
2015 · fourth_quarter · Q4
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Filing targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC via INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
2015 · third_quarter · Q3
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Filing targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC via INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
2015 · second_quarter · Q2
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection FTC 6(b) Patent Assertion Entity Activity Study
Filing targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC via INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
2015 · first_quarter · Q1
H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection FTC 6(b) Patent Assertion Entity Activity Study
Filing targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC via INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
2014 · fourth_quarter · Q4
H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; H.R. ____, Targeting Rogue and Opaque Letters Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Filing targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC via INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
2014 · third_quarter · Q3
H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; H.R. ____, Targeting Rogue and Opaque Letters Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act;Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Filing targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC via INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
2014 · second_quarter · Q2
H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review;customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Filing targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC via INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT, LLC
2014 · first_quarter · Q1
H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review;customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection
Filing targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE