RUSSELL MERBETH

Patent reform; America Invents Act implementation; H.R. 3666/S. 2082, Support Technology and Research for Our Nation's Growth and Economic Resilience (STRONGER) Patents Act of 2019

Patent reform; America Invents Act implementation; H.R. 3666/S. 2082, Support Technology and Research for Our Nation's Growth and Economic Resilience (STRONGER) Patents Act of 2019

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act; H.R. 5340, STRONGER Patents Act of 2018

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act; H.R. 5340, STRONGER Patents Act of 2018

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act; H.R. 5340, STRONGER Patents Act of 2018

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act; H.R. 5340, STRONGER Patents Act of 2018

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act; H.R. 5340, STRONGER Patents Act of 2018

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act; H.R. 5340, STRONGER Patents Act of 2018

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act; H.R. 5340, STRONGER Patents Act of 2018

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act; H.R. 5340, STRONGER Patents Act of 2018

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act; H.R. 5340, STRONGER Patents Act of 2018

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act; H.R. 5340, STRONGER Patents Act of 2018

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act; H.R. 5340, STRONGER Patents Act of 2018

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act; H.R. 5340, STRONGER Patents Act of 2018

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017; H.R. 2189, Trade Protection Not Troll Protection Act

Patent reform; PTO fee diversion; America Invents Act implementation; S. 1390, STRONGER Patents Act of 2017

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; S. 2733, The VENUE Act - issues related to proper venue for filing patent infringement cases in federal district court; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection FTC 6(b) Patent Assertion Entity Activity Study

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection FTC 6(b) Patent Assertion Entity Activity Study

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; S. 1137, The PATENTS Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection FTC 6(b) Patent Assertion Entity Activity Study

H.R. 9, The Innovation Act S. 632, STRONG Patents Act of 2015; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection FTC 6(b) Patent Assertion Entity Activity Study

H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; H.R. ____, Targeting Rogue and Opaque Letters Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review;customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review;customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; H.R. ____, Targeting Rogue and Opaque Letters Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act;Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review;customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; H.R. ____, Targeting Rogue and Opaque Letters Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act;Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; H.R. ____, Targeting Rogue and Opaque Letters Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; S. 2049, Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review;customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel; post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

Goodlatte Discussion Draft H.R. 2024, End Anonymous Patents Act; H.R. 2639, Patent Litigation and Innovation Act of 2013; H.R. 2766, Stopping the Offensive Use of Patents Act STOP Act;H.R. 6245, The SHIELD Act S. 866; Patent Quality Improvement Act of 2013; S. 1013, Patent Abuse Reduction Act; White House Task Force on Abusive Patent Issues; USPTO Real Parties In Interest proposal, Nov. 26, 2012

Goodlatte Discussion Draft H.R. 2024, End Anonymous Patents Act; H.R. 2639, Patent Litigation and Innovation Act of 2013; H.R. 2766, Stopping the Offensive Use of Patents Act STOP Act;H.R. 6245, The SHIELD Act S. 866; Patent Quality Improvement Act of 2013; S. 1013, Patent Abuse Reduction Act; White House Task Force on Abusive Patent Issues; USPTO Real Parties In Interest proposal, Nov. 26, 2012

Goodlatte Discussion Draft H.R. 2024, End Anonymous Patents Act; H.R. 2639, Patent Litigation and Innovation Act of 2013; H.R. 2766, Stopping the Offensive Use of Patents Act STOP Act;H.R. 6245, The SHIELD Act S. 866; Patent Quality Improvement Act of 2013; S. 1013, Patent Abuse Reduction Act; White House Task Force on Abusive Patent Issues; USPTO Real Parties In Interest proposal, Nov. 26, 2012

Goodlatte Discussion Draft H.R. 2024, End Anonymous Patents Act; H.R. 2639, Patent Litigation and Innovation Act of 2013; H.R. 2766, Stopping the Offensive Use of Patents Act STOP Act;H.R. 6245, The SHIELD Act S. 866; Patent Quality Improvement Act of 2013; S. 1013, Patent Abuse Reduction Act; White House Task Force on Abusive Patent Issues; USPTO Real Parties In Interest proposal, Nov. 26, 2012

H.R. 3309, The Innovation Act; S. 1720, Patent Transparency and Improvements Act of 2013; Issues relating to joinder of parties; fee shifting; identity of patent ownership; covered business method review; customer stay; heightened pleading requirements; demand letters; discovery limits; post-grant review estoppel;post-grant claim construction; double patenting; bankruptcy protection

Goodlatte Discussion Draft H.R. 2024, End Anonymous Patents Act; H.R. 2639, Patent Litigation and Innovation Act of 2013; H.R. 2766, Stopping the Offensive Use of Patents Act STOP Act;H.R. 6245, The SHIELD Act S. 866; Patent Quality Improvement Act of 2013; S. 1013, Patent Abuse Reduction Act; White House Task Force on Abusive Patent Issues; USPTO Real Parties In Interest proposal, Nov. 26, 2012