vs 106 other HJRES bills in the 117th — cohort avg 84d
Summary
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment declaring that women shall have equal rights in the United States and every place subject to its jurisdiction. The amendment prohibits the United States or any state from denying or abridging equal rights under the law on account of sex.
Lobbying filings that explicitly cite this bill (20)
These links require the bill number to appear in the filing's source-reported specific issue text. Client expenses and lobbying-firm income are separate disclosure fields.
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
H.J. Res. 28, Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women, In support of a constitutional amendment prohibiting or denying equality of rights under the law; S.J. Res. 1/H.J. Res. 17, Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment, In support of removing the deadline for ratification of the equal rights amendment; S. 4/H.R. 4, John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2001, In support of equal access to the ballot box; S. 2747, Freedom to Vote Act, In support of strengthening voting access; H.R 5746, Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act, In support of improving access to the ballot box and strengthening voting rights; H.Res. 891, Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the article of amendment (commonly known as the "Equal Rights Amendment") to the Constitution is valid, In support of the Equal Rights Amendment as the 28th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. H.R. 6268Protect Black Women and Girls Act of 2021In support of the establishment of an Interagency Task Force to examine the conditions and experiences of Black women and girls
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
Contacts in opposition to legislative or executive actions that seek to add to the U.S. Constitution the language of the "Equal Rights Amendment" that originally was submitted to the states by the 92nd Congress as H.J. Res. 208 on March 22,1972, which failed ratification effective March 22, 1979. This includes opposition to H.J. Res. 17 and S.J. Res. 1, resolutions purporting by multiple unconstitutional mechanisms to retroactively nullify the seven-year ratification deadline that was included in the Proposing Clause of H.J.Res. 208 of the 92nd Congress. This also includes contacts to encourage opposition to any actions by any component of the Executive Branch that would seek to evade or ignore the insurmountable constitutional obstacles and court decisions barring resuscitation of the Equal Rights Amendment. Contacts in opposition to H.J. Res. 28 (Maloney), "Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women."
Client expense: $80,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
H.J. Res. 28, Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women, In support of a constitutional amendment prohibiting or denying equality of rights under the law; S.J. Res. 1/H.J. Res. 17, Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment, In support of removing the deadline for ratification of the equal rights amendment; S. 4/H.R. 4, John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2001, In support of equal access to the ballot box; S. 2747, Freedom to Vote Act, In support of strengthening voting access; H.R 5746, Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act, In support of improving access to the ballot box and strengthening voting rights; H.Res. 891, Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the article of amendment (commonly known as the "Equal Rights Amendment") to the Constitution is valid, In support of the Equal Rights Amendment as the 28th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Client expense: $87,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
Contacts in opposition to legislative or executive actions that seek to add to the U.S. Constitution the language of the "Equal Rights Amendment" that originally was submitted to the states by the 92nd Congress as H.J. Res. 208 on March 22,1972, which failed ratification effective March 22, 1979. These include: -- opposition to H.J. Res. 17 and S.J. Res. 1, resolutions purporting by multiple unconstitutional mechanisms to retroactively nullify the seven-year ratification deadline that was included in the Proposing Clause of H.J.Res. 208 of the 92nd Congress; -- opposition to any actions by any component of the Executive Branch that would seek to evade or ignore the insurmountable constitutional obstacles and court decisions barring resuscitation of the 1972 Equal Rights Amendment, including but not limited to opposition to schemes by certain members of Congress and others to pressure the Archivist of the United States to certify the ERA in contravention of federal court rulings. -- opposition to H.Res. 891 (Speier), nugatory one-house resolution declaring "the sense of the House of Representatives" that the Equal Rights Amendment is part of the Constitution. Contacts in opposition to H.J. Res. 28 (Maloney), "Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women." Contacts of advisory and informational nature regarding the nomination of Colleen Shogan, Ph.D., as Archivist of the United States (PN 2457), with respect to the status of the Equal Rights Amendment. No position taken on confirmation during this reporting period. Contacts of informational and advisory nature regarding Senate Amendment 5765 (Braun) to SA 5745 to H.R. 6833 (continuing resolution), an amendment to impose responsibilities on the Archivist of the United States with respect to applications by state legislatures to call a constitutional convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution. No position taken during this reporting period on the substance of this amendment (which was withdrawn).
Client expense: $70,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
H.J. Res. 28, Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women, In support of a constitutional amendment prohibiting or denying equality of rights under the law; S.J. Res. 1/H.J. Res. 17, Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment, In support of removing the deadline for ratification of the equal rights amendment; S. 4/H.R. 4, John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2001, In support of equal access to the ballot box; S. 2747, Freedom to Vote Act, In support of strengthening voting access; H.R. 5746, Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act, In support of improving access to the ballot box and strengthening voting rights; H. Res. 891, Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the article of amendment (commonly known as the "Equal Rights Amendment") to the Constitution is valid, In support of the Equal Rights Amendment as the 28th Amendment to the Constitutions of the United States.
Client expense: $115,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
Contacts in opposition to legislative or executive actions that seek to add to the U.S. Constitution the language of the "Equal Rights Amendment" that originally was submitted to the states by the 92nd Congress as H.J. Res. 208 on March 22,1972, which failed ratification effective March 22, 1979. This includes: -- opposition to H.J. Res. 17 and S.J. Res. 1, resolutions purporting by multiple unconstitutional mechanisms to retroactively nullify the seven-year ratification deadline that was included in the Proposing Clause of H.J.Res. 208 of the 92nd Congress. -- opposition to any actions by any component of the Executive Branch that would seek to evade or ignore the insurmountable constitutional obstacles and court decisions barring resuscitation of the 1972 Equal Rights Amendment, including but not limited to opposition to schemes to pressure the Archivist of the United States to certify the ERA in contravention of federal court rulings and the legal positions of the Department of Justice. -- opposition to H.Res. 891 (Speier), declaring "the sense of the House of Representatives" that the Equal Rights Amendment is part of the Constitution. -- opposition to H.J. Res. 28 (Maloney), "Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women." Contacts in opposition to the nomination of Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court.
Client expense: $60,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
H.R. 2741 Consolidated Appropriations Act; Budget of the U.S. Government, FY 2023; America Competes Act; H.J.Res. 17, S.J.Res. 1 Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment; H.J.Res. 28, S.J.Res. 28 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women; S. 3790 Ultrasound Informed Consent Act; FDA Nominee Robert Califf; SCOTUS Nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson; S.J.Res. 41; S.J.Res. 53; H.R. 6505, S. 3537 Child Tax Credit for Pregnant Moms Act; H.R. 7294 Pregnant Students Rights Act; H.R. 7179 Protecting Girls with Turner Syndrome Act; HHS Reproductive Healthcare Task Force; H.R. 6702 Safeguarding Womens and Childrens Health Act; H.R. 6536 Stopping Traffickers and Their Accomplices Act; H.Res. 883 Recognizing National Sanctity of Human Life Day; No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act; H.R. 705 Heartbeat Protection Act; Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act; S. 1975, H.R. 3755 Womens Health Protection Act; Defunding abortion providers; H.R. 554, S. 78 Support and Value Moms and Babies Act; Maternal Mortality; Chemical abortion; Bioethics; H.R. 5487 SHINE for Autumn Act; H.R. 6060 Conscience Protection Act
Client expense: $290,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
H.R. 2741 Consolidated Appropriations Act; Budget of the U.S. Government, FY 2023; H.J.Res. 17, S.J.Res. 1 Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment; H.J.Res. 28, S.J.Res. 28 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women; S. 3790 Ultrasound Informed Consent Act; H.R. 7179 Protecting Girls with Turner Syndrome Act; HHS Reproductive Healthcare Task Force; H.R. 6702 Safeguarding Womens and Childrens Health Act; S. 1975, H.R. 3755 Womens Health Protection Act; H.R. 554, S. 78 Support and Value Moms and Babies Act; Maternal Mortality; Bioethics; H.R. 5487 SHINE for Autumn Act; H.R. 6060 Conscience Protection Act
Client expense: $290,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
H.J.Res. 17, S.J.Res. 1 Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment; H.J.Res. 28, S.J.Res. 28 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women; S. 1975, H.R. 3755 Womens Health Protection Act
Client expense: $290,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
Contacts in opposition to legislative or executive actions that seek to add to the U.S. Constitution the language of the "Equal Rights Amendment" that originally was submitted to the states by the 92nd Congress as H.J. Res. 208 on March 22,1972, which failed ratification effective March 22, 1979. This includes: -- opposition to H.J. Res. 17 and S.J. Res. 1, resolutions purporting by multiple unconstitutional mechanisms to retroactively nullify the seven-year ratification deadline that was included in the Proposing Clause of H.J.Res. 208 of the 92nd Congress. -- opposition to any actions by any component of the Executive Branch that would seek to evade or ignore the insurmountable constitutional obstacles and court decisions barring resuscitation of the 1972 Equal Rights Amendment, including but not limited to opposition to schemes to pressure the Archivist of the United States to certify the ERA in contravention of federal court rulings and the legal positions of the Department of Justice. -- opposition to H.Res. 891 (Speier), declaring "the sense of the House of Representatives" that the Equal Rights Amendment is part of the Constitution. -- opposition to H.J. Res. 28 (Maloney), "Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women." Contacts in opposition to the nomination of Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court.
Client expense: $80,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
H.J. Res. 28, Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women, In support of a constitutional amendment prohibiting or denying equality of rights under the law; S.J. Res. 1/H.J. Res. 17, Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment, In support of removing the deadline for ratification of the equal rights amendment S. 4/H.R. 4, John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2001, In support of equal access to the ballot box S. 2747, Freedom to Vote Act, In support of strengthening voting access; H.R 5746, Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act, In support of improving access to the ballot box and strengthening voting rights; H.Res. 891, Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the article of amendment (commonly known as the "Equal Rights Amendment") to the Constitution is valid, In support of the Equal Rights Amendment as the 28th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Client expense: $120,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
H.J. Res. 28, Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women, In support of a constitutional amendment prohibiting or denying equality of rights under the law;
S.J. Res. 1/H.J. Res. 17, Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment, In support of removing the deadline for ratification of the equal rights amendment;
S. 4/H.R. 4, John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2001, In support of equal access to the ballot box;
S. 2747, Freedom to Vote Act, In support of strengthening voting access;
H.R 5746, Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act, In support of improving access to the ballot box and strengthening voting rights.
Client expense: $100,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
Preventing Vigilante Stalking that Stops Womens Access to Healthcare and Abortion Rights Act of 2021 (H.R. 5710/S.3057)
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women. (H.J. Res. 28)
The Equality Act (S. 393)
Client expense: $153,397 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Executive Office of the President (EOP), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), SENATE
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
Contacts in opposition to legislative or executive actions that seek to add to the U.S. Constitution the language of the "Equal Rights Amendment" that originally was submitted to the states by the 92nd Congress as H.J. Res. 208 on March 22,1972, which failed ratification effective March 22, 1979. This includes opposition to H.J. Res. 17 and S.J. Res. 1, resolutions purporting by multiple unconstitutional mechanisms to retroactively nullify the seven-year ratification deadline that was included in the Proposing Clause of H.J.Res. 208 of the 92nd Congress. This also includes contacts to encourage opposition to any actions by any component of the Executive Branch that would seek to evade or ignore the insurmountable constitutional obstacles and court decisions barring resuscitation of the Equal Rights Amendment.
Contacts in opposition to H.J. Res. 28 (Maloney), "Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women."
Contacts in opposition to H.R. 51 to grant statehood to D.C. due to constitutional concerns. Additionally, if D.C. were to become a state, the predictable result will be tax funding of hundreds (if not more) of elective abortions in D.C. annually.
Contacts regarding a resolution (not introduced) concerning protecting parents rights in directing their childs education and potential impact on abortion.
Client expense: $60,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
H.J. Res. 28, Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women, In support of a constitutional amendment prohibiting or denying equality of rights under the law;
S.J. Res. 1/H.J. Res. 17, Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment, In support of removing the deadline for ratification of the equal rights amendment;
S. 4/H.R. 4, John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, In support of equal access to the ballot box.
Client expense: $60,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
Contacts in opposition to legislative or executive actions that seek to add to the U.S. Constitution the language of the "Equal Rights Amendment" that originally was submitted to the states by the 92nd Congress as H.J. Res. 208 on March 22,1972, which failed ratification effective March 22, 1979. This includes opposition to H.J. Res. 17 and S.J. Res. 1, resolutions purporting by compound unconstitutional mechanisms to retroactively nullify the seven-year ratification deadline that was included in the Proposing Clause of H.J.Res. 208 of the 92nd Congress. This also includes opposition to any actions by any component of the Executive Branch that would seek to evade or ignore the insurmountable constitutional impediments to resuscitation of the Equal Rights Amendment submitted to the states in 1972.
Contacts in opposition to H.J. Res. 28 (Maloney), "Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women."
Contacts in opposition to H.R. 51 to grant statehood to D.C. due to constitutional concerns. Additionally, if D.C. were to become a state, the predictable result will be tax funding of hundreds (if not more) of elective abortions in D.C. annually.
Client expense: $70,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
Contacts in opposition to legislative or executive actions that seek to add to the U.S. Constitution the language of the "Equal Rights Amendment" that originally was submitted to the states by the 92nd Congress as H.J. Res. 208 on March 22,1972, which failed ratification effective March 22, 1979. This includes opposition to H.J. Res. 17 and S.J. Res. 1, resolutions purporting by compound unconstitutional mechanisms to retroactively nullify the seven-year ratification deadline that was included in the Proposing Clause of H.J.Res. 208 of the 92nd Congress. This also includes opposition to any actions by any component of the Executive Branch that would seek to evade or ignore the insurmountable constitutional impediments to resuscitation of the Equal Rights Amendment submitted to the states in 1972.
Contacts in opposition to H.J. Res. 28 (Maloney), "Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women."
Contacts in opposition to H.R. 51 to grant statehood to D.C. due to constitutional concerns. Additionally, if D.C. were to become a state, the predictable result will be tax funding of hundreds (if not more) of elective abortions in D.C. annually. Letter sent to the House April 19, 2021.
Client expense: $30,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
H.J. Res. 28, Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women, In support of a constitutional amendment prohibiting or denying equality of rights under the law;
S.J. Res. 1/H.J. Res. 17, Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment, In support of removing the deadline for ratification of the equal rights amendment.
Client expense: $130,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
H.J. Res. 28, Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women, In support of a constitutional amendment prohibiting or denying equality of rights under the law;
S.J. Res. 1/H.J. Res. 17, Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment, In support of removing the deadline for ratification of the equal rights amendment.
Client expense: $130,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Cited source text, amounts, lobbyists, and targets
Contacts in opposition to legislative or executive actions that seek to add to the U.S. Constitution the language of the "Equal Rights Amendment" that originally was submitted to the states by the 92nd Congress as H.J. Res. 208 on March 22,1972, which failed ratification effective March 22, 1979. This includes opposition to H.J. Res. 17 and S.J. Res. 1, resolutions purporting by compound unconstitutional mechanisms to retroactively nullify the seven-year ratification deadline that was included in the Proposing Clause of H.J.Res. 208 of the 92nd Congress. This also includes opposition to any actions by any component of the Executive Branch that would seek to evade or ignore the insurmountable constitutional impediments to resuscitation of the Equal Rights Amendment submitted to the states in 1972.
Contacts in opposition to H.J. Res. 28 (Maloney), "Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to equal rights for men and women."
Contacts in opposition to H.R. 51 to grant statehood to D.C. due to constitutional concerns. Additionally, if D.C. were to become a state, the predictable result will be tax funding of hundreds (if not more) of elective abortions in D.C. annually.
Client expense: $60,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Executive Office of the President (EOP), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), Natl Council on Disability, SENATE
Government targets: Executive Office of the President (EOP), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), Natl Council on Disability, SENATE