Loading…
Government Pension Offset Reform Act
Legislative Progress
Introduced
February 11, 2003
Latest Action
February 11, 2003
Primary Sponsor
Barbara A. MikulskiDemocratic(MD)
Momentum (last 30 days)
0
score
0 actions · 0 new cosponsors · 0 votes
Speed vs cohort
0pct
0d open
vs 3,018 other S bills in the 108th — cohort avg 48d
No CRS summary is available for this bill yet. The source title, actions, sponsors, and text versions below come from Congress.gov.
These links require the bill number to appear in the filing's source-reported specific issue text. Client expenses and lobbying-firm income are separate disclosure fields.
Filing registrants (2)
2004 · year_end · Retirement
HR 887 and S 363, to amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide that the reductions in Social Security benefits which are required in the case of spouses and survivor spouses who are also receiving certain Government pensions shall be equal to the amount by which to total amount of the combined monthly benefit (before reduction) and monthly pension exceeds $12,000. HR 594 and S 349, to amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the Government Pension Offset and the Windfall Elimination Provision; HR 2011 and S 1011 to amend title II of the Social Security Act to restrict the application of the Windfall Elimination Provision to individuals whose combined monthly income from benefits under such title and other monthly periodic payments exceeds $2,000 and to provide for a graduated implementation of such provision on amounts above such $2,000 amount
Bills with similar content found using semantic analysis.
Sources: Congress.gov
Client expense: $100,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Office of Personnel Management (OPM), SENATE, Social Security Administration (SSA)
2004 · year_end · Retirement
H.R.4324 H.R.4391 H.R.2011 H.R.1231 H.R.594 H.R.577 H.R.75 S.2657 S.2455 S.1011 S.623 S.363 S.349
Client expense: $79,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Office of Management & Budget (OMB), Office of Personnel Management (OPM), SENATE, White House Office
2004 · mid_year · Retirement
HR 887 and S 363, to amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide that the reductions in Social Security benefits which are required in the case of spouses and survivor spouses who are also receiving certain Government pensions shall be equal to the amount by which the total amount exceeds $12,000. HR 594 and S 349, to amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the Government Pension Offset and the Windfall Elimination Provision; HR 2011 and S 1011 to amend title II of the Social Security Act to restrict the application of the Windfall Elimination Provision to individuals whose combined monthly income from benefits under such title and other monthly periodic payments exceeds $2,000 and to provide for a graduated implementation of such provision on amounts above such $2,000 amount.
Client expense: $100,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Office of Personnel Management (OPM), SENATE, Social Security Administration (SSA)
2004 · mid_year · Retirement
H.R.4391 H.R.2631 H.R.2011 H.R.1231 H.R.887 H.R.594 H.R.577 H.R.75 S.2455 S.1011 S.623 S.363 S.349
Client expense: $79,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE
2003 · year_end · Retirement
HR 887 and S 363, to amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide that the reductions in Social Security benefits which are required in the case of spouses and survivor spouses who are also receiving certain Government pensions shall be equal to the amount by which to total amount of the combined monthly benefit (before reduction) and monthly pension exceeds $12,000. HR 594 and S 349, to amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the Government Pension Offset and the Windfall Elimination Provision; HR 2011 and S 1011 to amend title II of the Social Security Act to restrict the application of the Windfall Elimination Provision to individuals whose combined monthly income from benefits under such title and other monthly periodic payments exceeds $2,000 and to provide for a graduated implementation of such provision on amounts above such $2,000 amount.
Client expense: $100,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Office of Management & Budget (OMB), Office of Personnel Management (OPM), SENATE, Social Security Administration (SSA)
2003 · year_end · Retirement
H.R.75 H.R.577 H.R.594 H.R.887 H.R.1231 H.R.2011 H.R.2631 S.349 S.363 S.623 S.1011
Client expense: $79,000 · Firm income: Not reported
Government targets: Government Accountability Office (GAO), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Office of Personnel Management (OPM), SENATE
| Democratic |
| ND |
| Christopher Dodd | Democratic | CT |
| Daniel K. Akaka | Democratic | HI |
| Edward Kennedy | Democratic | MA |
| George Voinovich | Republican | OH |
| Hillary Clinton | Democratic | NY |
| Jack Reed | Democratic | RI |
| James Jeffords | Independent | VT |
| Jeff Bingaman | Democratic | NM |
| John Breaux | Democratic | LA |
| John F. Kerry | Democratic | MA |
| John Warner | Republican | VA |
| Joseph Biden | Democratic | DE |
| Maria Cantwell | Democratic | WA |
| Mary L. Landrieu | Democratic | LA |
| Michael DeWine | Republican | OH |
| Olympia J. Snowe | Republican | ME |
| Patrick J. Leahy | Democratic | VT |
| Patty Murray | Democratic | WA |
| Paul Sarbanes | Democratic | MD |
| Richard J. Durbin | Democratic | IL |
| Saxby Chambliss | Republican | GA |
| Susan M. Collins | Republican | ME |
| Thomas Daschle | Democratic | SD |
| Tim Johnson | Democratic | SD |
| Tom Harkin | Democratic | IA |