Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $10,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $10,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Support for legislation to enable Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo to operate Class 2 gaming pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, particularly HR 2873 and S.1536.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Issues related to Native American gaming policy; S.1536/H.R.2873, Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $90,000

Support for legislation to enable Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo to operate Class 2 gaming pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, particularly HR 2873 and S.1536.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Issues related to Native American gaming policy; S.1536/H.R.2873, Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $90,000

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $10,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $10,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $7,500

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $7,500

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Support for legislation to enable Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo to operate Class 2 gaming pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, particularly HR 2873 and S.1536.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Issues related to Native American gaming policy; S.1536/H.R.2873, Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $90,000

Support for legislation to enable Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo to operate Class 2 gaming pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, particularly HR 2873 and S.1536, along with opportunities to include these bills in the FY24 NDAA and FY24 Interior Appropriations Acts in the House and Senate.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Issues related to Native American gaming policy; S.1536/H.R.2873, Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $90,000

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $7,500

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $7,500

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $7,500

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $7,500

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Support for legislation to enable Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo to operate Class 2 gaming pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, particularly HR 2873 and S.1536, along with opportunities to include these bills in the FY24 NDAA and FY24 Interior Appropriations Acts in the House and Senate.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Issues related to Native American gaming policy; S.1536/H.R.2873, Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $90,000

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Support for legislation to enable Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo to operate Class 2 gaming pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, particularly HR 2873 and S.1536, along with opportunities to include these bills in the FY24 NDAA and FY24 Interior Appropriations Acts in the House and Senate.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Issues related to Native American gaming policy; S.1536/H.R.2873, Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $90,000

Opposing H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. This Act would allow two tribes in Texas to be regulated by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act despite the fact that the got federal recognition with the intention that they not open gaming facilities.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: Not reported

Opposing H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. This Act would allow two tribes in Texas to be regulated by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act despite the fact that the got federal recognition with the intention that they not open gaming facilities.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: Not reported