SUNLAND PARK RACETRACK & CASINO

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000

Matched citations: H.R.2873

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000

Matched citations: H.R.2873

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000

Matched citations: S.1536

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000

Matched citations: S.1536

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000

Matched citations: H.R.2873

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000

Matched citations: H.R.2873

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000

Matched citations: S.1536

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $10,000

Matched citations: S.1536

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $7,500

Matched citations: H.R.2873

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $7,500

Matched citations: H.R.2873

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $7,500

Matched citations: S.1536

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $7,500

Matched citations: S.1536

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $7,500

Matched citations: H.R.2873

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $7,500

Matched citations: H.R.2873

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $7,500

Matched citations: S.1536

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $7,500

Matched citations: S.1536

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $7,500

Matched citations: H.R.2873

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $7,500

Matched citations: H.R.2873

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $7,500

Matched citations: S.1536

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: $7,500

Matched citations: S.1536

H.R.2873/S.1536, the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Compliance Act. We oppose this bill. The bill would bring two Texas-based tribes under Indian Regulatory Gaming Act instead of having them remain within the parameters of the guiding statute that allowed for them to become federally recognized in the first place. Were this bill to pass, they could eventually force Texas into gaming compact negotiations, something we oppose.

Client expense: — · Firm income: —

Matched citations: H.R.2873