Loading…
This entity appears on both sides of lobbying disclosures. The firm tab shows registrant-reported income; the client tab shows client-reported lobbying spend. Contract awards are separate and are not included here.
Lobbying Spend
$4.0M
Filings
177
Firms Hired
4
Active Period
2000–2026
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
Expressing support for the designation of June 23, 2022, as National Federal Pell Grant Day.
2022 · second_quarter · Firm: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
1. Support for the FY2023 US Department of Educations International Education Title VI program budget in the Labor, HHS, Education appropriations bill. (House only) 2. Support for FY23 basic needs higher education student aid and grants, including: Basic Needs grants in FIPSE; CCAMPIS appropriations; campus-based aid in the Labor, HHS, Education appropriations bill. (House and Senate only) 3. Support for increased Pell Grant Funding in the FY 2023 Labor, HHS, Education appropriations bill (House only) 4. Support for H.Res. 1193 related to National Pell Grant Day 5. Support for additional FIPSE funding for community-based, academic enrichment programs (House only) 6. Support HEERF construction flexibility in FY23 Labor, HHS, Education appropriations bill. (House and Senate only) 7. Support for Congress to request GAO study on student health insurance coverage. 8. Support for inclusion of college student mental health provisions in bipartisan mental health legislation. 9. Support for reauthorization of Garrett Lee Smith Campus grant program. 10. Support for adjustments in CCAMPIS funding and structure metrics. (Department of Education only) 11. Support for provisions to address student debt. (Department of Education only) 12. Support for health care access. (Department of Education only) 13. Support for FY24 budget to include provisions for student basic needs. (Department of Education only)
Client expense: $100,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: H.Res. 1193
1. Support for $32 million for the Assistive Technology Act in the FY17 House and Senate Labor, HHS, Education appropriations bills. 2. Kinome: Support report language in the FY17 House and Senate Labor, HHS, Education appropriations bills related to kinome research at the NCI through research and center grants that support institutions with a critical mass of expertise on particular cancers, including ovarian, to apply that expertise to the entire kinome. 3. Outpatient payment adjustments for dedicated cancer centers: Support for legislative correction to Section 603 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 due to changes in the definition of covered hospital outpatient services in the underlying legislation. 4. Support for passage of 21st Century Cures Act, HR 34--House of Representatives only.
Client expense: $60,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 34
Patent Reform - The Innovation Act (HR 9) and the PATENT Act (S 1137). Opposed the mandatory fee-shifting provisions and involuntary joinder provisions in versions of HR 9. Additionally, articulated opposition to any inclusion of such provisions without any flexibility for university exemption in S 1137.
Client expense: $60,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 9
Patent Reform - The Innovation Act (HR 9) and the PATENT Act (S 1137). Opposed the mandatory fee-shifting provisions and involuntary joinder provisions in versions of HR 9. Additionally, articulated opposition to any inclusion of such provisions without any flexibility for university exemption in S 1137.
Client expense: $60,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S 1137
Patent Reform - The Innovation Act (HR 9) and the PATENT Act (S 1137). Opposed the mandatory fee-shifting provisions and involuntary joinder provisions in versions of HR 9. Additionally, articulated opposition to any inclusion of such provisions without any flexibility for university exemption in S 1137.
Client expense: $60,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 9
Patent Reform - The Innovation Act (HR 9) and the PATENT Act (S 1137). Opposed the mandatory fee-shifting provisions and involuntary joinder provisions in versions of HR 9. Additionally, articulated opposition to any inclusion of such provisions without any flexibility for university exemption in S 1137.
Client expense: $60,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S 1137
Patent Reform - The Innovation Act (HR 9) and the PATENT Act (S 1137). Opposed the mandatory fee-shifting provisions and involuntary joinder provisions in versions of HR 9. Additionally, articulated opposition to any inclusion of such provisions without any flexibility for university exemption in S 1137.
Client expense: $50,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 9
Patent Reform - The Innovation Act (HR 9) and the PATENT Act (S 1137). Opposed the mandatory fee-shifting provisions and involuntary joinder provisions in versions of HR 9. Additionally, articulated opposition to any inclusion of such provisions without any flexibility for university exemption in S 1137.
Client expense: $50,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S 1137
Patent Reform - The Innovation Act (HR 9) and the PATENT Act (S 1137). Opposed the mandatory fee-shifting provisions and involuntary joinder provisions in versions of HR 9. Additionally, articulated opposition to any inclusion of such provisions without any flexibility for university exemption in S 1137.
Client expense: $60,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 9
Patent Reform - The Innovation Act (HR 9) and the PATENT Act (S 1137). Opposed the mandatory fee-shifting provisions and involuntary joinder provisions in versions of HR 9. Additionally, articulated opposition to any inclusion of such provisions without any flexibility for university exemption in S 1137.
Client expense: $60,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S 1137
America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2015
2015 · fourth_quarter · Firm: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
America COMPETES Reauthorization Act (HR 1806) -- opposition to HR 1806, specifically due to the decreased authorization to the social science research budget in the National Science Foundation. House only.
Client expense: $50,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 1806
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016
2015 · fourth_quarter · Firm: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
1. Assistive Technology Act - general explanation of the current statute and impact on Temple University Institute on Disabilities. No specific bill number. House and Senate 2.NIH funding - Supporting at least $32 billion in the House and Senate Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Appropriations bill (HR 3020 and S 1695).
Client expense: $50,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 3020
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016
2015 · fourth_quarter · Firm: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
NIH funding - Supporting at least $32 billion in the House and Senate Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Appropriations bill (HR 3020 and S 1695).
Client expense: $50,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 3020
Patent Reform - The Innovation Act (HR 9) and the PATENT Act (S 1137). Opposed the mandatory fee-shifting provisions and involuntary joinder provisions in versions of HR 9. Additionally, articulated opposition to any inclusion of such provisions without any flexibility for university exemption in S 1137.
Client expense: $50,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 9
Patent Reform - The Innovation Act (HR 9) and the PATENT Act (S 1137). Opposed the mandatory fee-shifting provisions and involuntary joinder provisions in versions of HR 9. Additionally, articulated opposition to any inclusion of such provisions without any flexibility for university exemption in S 1137.
Client expense: $50,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S 1137
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016
2015 · fourth_quarter · Firm: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
1. Assistive Technology Act - general explanation of the current statute and impact on Temple University Institute on Disabilities. No specific bill number. House and Senate 2.NIH funding - Supporting at least $32 billion in the House and Senate Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Appropriations bill (HR 3020 and S 1695).
Client expense: $50,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S 1695
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016
2015 · fourth_quarter · Firm: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
NIH funding - Supporting at least $32 billion in the House and Senate Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Appropriations bill (HR 3020 and S 1695).
Client expense: $50,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S 1695
America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2015
2015 · third_quarter · Firm: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
America COMPETES Reauthorization Act (HR 1806) -- opposition to HR 1806, specifically due to the decreased authorization to the social science research budget in the National Science Foundation. House only.
Client expense: $70,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 1806
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016
2015 · third_quarter · Firm: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
NIH funding - Supporting at least $32 billion in the House and Senate Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Appropriations bill (HR 3020 and S 1695).
Client expense: $70,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 3020
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016
2015 · third_quarter · Firm: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
1. Assistive Technology Act - general explanation of the current statute and impact on Temple University Institute on Disabilities. No specific bill number. House and Senate 2.NIH funding - Supporting at least $32 billion in the House and Senate Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Appropriations bill (HR 3020 and S 1695).
Client expense: $70,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 3020
Patent Reform - The Innovation Act (HR 9) and the PATENT Act (S 1137). Opposed the mandatory fee-shifting provisions and involuntary joinder provisions in versions of HR 9. Additionally, articulated opposition to any inclusion of such provisions without any flexibility for university exemption in S 1137.
Client expense: $70,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 9
Patent Reform - The Innovation Act (HR 9) and the PATENT Act (S 1137). Opposed the mandatory fee-shifting provisions and involuntary joinder provisions in versions of HR 9. Additionally, articulated opposition to any inclusion of such provisions without any flexibility for university exemption in S 1137.
Client expense: $70,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S 1137
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016
2015 · third_quarter · Firm: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
NIH funding - Supporting at least $32 billion in the House and Senate Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Appropriations bill (HR 3020 and S 1695).
Client expense: $70,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S 1695
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016
2015 · third_quarter · Firm: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
1. Assistive Technology Act - general explanation of the current statute and impact on Temple University Institute on Disabilities. No specific bill number. House and Senate 2.NIH funding - Supporting at least $32 billion in the House and Senate Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Appropriations bill (HR 3020 and S 1695).
Client expense: $70,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S 1695
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2016
2015 · third_quarter · Firm: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY
1. Assistive Technology Act - general explanation of the current statute and impact on Temple University Institute on Disabilities. No specific bill number. House and Senate 2.NIH funding - Supporting at least $32 billion in the House and Senate Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Appropriations bill (HR 3020 and S 1695).
Client expense: $70,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 3020
Source: Senate LDA