Loading…
This entity appears on both sides of lobbying disclosures. The firm tab shows registrant-reported income; the client tab shows client-reported lobbying spend. Contract awards are separate and are not included here.
Lobbying Spend
$523K
Filings
71
Firms Hired
1
Active Period
2006–2023
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
Inmate Calling Technical Corrections Act of 2018
2018 · third_quarter · Firm: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Legislative and regulatory matters relating to inmate telecommunications services and law enforcement use of location-based services / S. 2520 - Inmate Calling Technical Corrections Act of 2018
Client expense: $40,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S. 2520
Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2017
2017 · second_quarter · Firm: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Concerns with FCC Docket No. 12-375, the Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Service Petition as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers. Concerns with HR 1184, the Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2017 as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 1184
Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2017
2017 · second_quarter · Firm: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Concerns with FCC Docket No. 12-375, the Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Service Petition as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers. Concerns with HR 1184, the Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2017 as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 1184
Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2013
2014 · fourth_quarter · Firm: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Concerns with HR 1403, the Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2013 as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers. Concerns with S 1749, the Cell Phone Contraband Act of 2010 as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers cost of providing service. Concerns with FCC Docket No. 12-375, the Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Service Petition as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 1403
Cell Phone Contraband Act of 2010
2014 · fourth_quarter · Firm: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Concerns with HR 1403, the Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2013 as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers. Concerns with S 1749, the Cell Phone Contraband Act of 2010 as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers cost of providing service. Concerns with FCC Docket No. 12-375, the Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Service Petition as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S 1749
Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2013
2014 · third_quarter · Firm: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Concerns with HR 1403, the Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2013 as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers. Concerns with FCC Docket No. 12-375, the Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Service Petition as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 1403
Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2013
2013 · third_quarter · Firm: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Concerns with HR 1403 , the Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2013 as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 1403
Cell Phone Contraband Act of 2010
2011 · second_quarter · Firm: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Concerns with S 1749, the Cell Phone Contraband Act of 2010 as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers cost of providing service. Concerns with FCC Docket No. 96-128, the Martha Wright Petition as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers. Support of Securus Technologies Petition for Declaratory Ruling at the FCC - Docket No. 09-144.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S 1749
Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2009
2010 · third_quarter · Firm: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Concerns with HR 1133, the Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2009 as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers. Concerns with S 1749, the Cell Phone Contraband Act of 2010 as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers cost of providing service.
Client expense: $8,200 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 1133
Cell Phone Contraband Act of 2010
2010 · third_quarter · Firm: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Concerns with HR 1133, the Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2009 as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers. Concerns with S 1749, the Cell Phone Contraband Act of 2010 as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers cost of providing service.
Client expense: $8,200 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S 1749
Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2009
2010 · first_quarter · Firm: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Concerns with HR 1133, the Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2009 as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers.
Client expense: $11,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 1133
Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2007
2007 · year_end · Firm: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Concerns with HR 555, the Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2007 as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers.
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 555
Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2007
2007 · mid_year · Firm: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Concerns with HR555, Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2007, as it relates to Inmate Telephone Service providers.
Client expense: $20,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR555
Source: Senate LDA