This entity appears on both sides of lobbying disclosures. The firm tab shows registrant-reported income; the client tab shows client-reported lobbying spend. Contract awards are separate and are not included here.
Lobbying Spend
$191K
Filings
80
Firms Hired
1
Active Period
2003–2026
Client-reported lobbying expenses on LDA filings
Lobbying firms retained by this client; amounts are client-reported expenses when available
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
RISE Act
2020 · third_quarter · Firm: BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY - STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
Same issues as were described in the Budget/Appropriations section but because they all involved Higher Education, included in this category as well: Congressman Brindisi(office) contacts: On July 8, I had a brief conversation with Congressman Brindisi's legislative director Jonathan Lipe regarding the Congressman's support of the RISE Act (HR 7308). We thanked him for his support. On Monday, Aug. 3rd our President and I held a conference call with the Congressman simply to discuss the status of a possible relief bill and find out whether it included direct relief for Higher Ed. and specifically Binghamton. We also updated the Congressman, just for information purposes, on our plans for Restarting Binghamton which included welcoming students back and resuming in person and online classes for the fall semester. On August 27, I just contacted Jonathan Lipe again just to see what he was hearing about the possibility of a stimulus bill. There was no definitive information available. Senator Schumer: On Tuesday, July 14, We (Binghamton) organized a conference call for all of the SUNY Center GR reps to discuss the recent DHS(ICE) rule that international students who did not have an in-person class in the coming semester could NOT stay in the country. During the call, all explained to the Senator's staff how this new rule would negatively impact our students and our individual campuses. Later that day, that rule was revised again and this issue was no longer an issue for our respective universities or students. On Wednesday August 5th, I communicated with Senator Schumer's regional representative to inform her that IF there was a new round of stimulus money and it included direct relief for higher education, we wanted her to relay to the Senator and other staff that using a funding model based on FTE's and not headcount was preferable. Not just because it benefits four year institutions more than 2 year but explained that in our opinion it was more equitable. --
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 7308
RISE Act
2020 · third_quarter · Firm: BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY - STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
Congressman Brindisi(office) contacts: On July 8, I had a brief conversation with Congressman Brindisi's legislative director Jonathan Lipe regarding the Congressman's support of the RISE Act (HR 7308). We thanked him for his support. On Monday, Aug. 3rd our President and I held a conference call with the Congressman simply to discuss the status of a possible relief bill and find out whether it included direct relief for Higher Ed. and specifically Binghamton. We also updated the Congressman, just for information purposes, on our plans for Restarting Binghamton which included welcoming students back and resuming in person and online classes for the fall semester. On August 27, I just contacted Jonathan Lipe again just to see what he was hearing about the possibility of a stimulus bill. There was no definitive information available. Senator Schumer: On Tuesday, July 14, We (Binghamton) organized a conference call for all of the SUNY Center GR reps to discuss the recent DHS(ICE) rule that international students who did not have an in-person class in the coming semester could NOT stay in the country. During the call, all explained to the Senator's staff how this new rule would negatively impact our students and our individual campuses. Later that day, that rule was revised again and this issue was no longer an issue for our respective universities or students. On Wednesday August 5th, I communicated with Senator Schumer's regional representative to inform her that IF there was a new round of stimulus money and it included direct relief for higher education, we wanted her to relay to the Senator and other staff that using a funding model based on FTE's and not headcount was preferable. Not just because it benefits four year institutions more than 2 year but explained that in our opinion it was more equitable. --
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 7308
Manufacturing Universities Act of 2014
2014 · third_quarter · Firm: BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY - STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
Support for Manufacturing Universities Act of 2014 (S. 2719)
Client expense: $10,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S. 2719
Collegiate Housing and Infrastructure Act of 2013
2014 · second_quarter · Firm: BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY - STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
HR.1449/S.654 - Support for the Collegiate Housing and Infrastructure Act.
Client expense: $20,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR.1449
Collegiate Housing and Infrastructure Act of 2013
2014 · second_quarter · Firm: BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY - STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
HR.1449/S.654 - Support for the Collegiate Housing and Infrastructure Act.
Client expense: $20,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S.654
Startup Act 2.0
2012 · second_quarter · Firm: BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY - STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
S.3217/HR 5893 - Start-Up Act 2.0 - concerns related to legislation regarding "free-agency" provision
Client expense: $10,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 5893
Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2008
2012 · second_quarter · Firm: BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY - STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
S.3217/HR 5893 - Start-Up Act 2.0 - concerns related to legislation regarding "free-agency" provision
Client expense: $10,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S.3217
Startup Act 2.0
2012 · first_quarter · Firm: BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY - STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
S.3217/HR 5893 - Start-Up Act 2.0 - concerns related to legislation regarding "free-agency" provision
Client expense: $10,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: HR 5893
Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2008
2012 · first_quarter · Firm: BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY - STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
S.3217/HR 5893 - Start-Up Act 2.0 - concerns related to legislation regarding "free-agency" provision
Client expense: $10,000 · Firm income: —
Matched citations: S.3217
Source: Senate LDA