Loading…
Lobbying Income
$2.1M
Filings
121
Unique Clients
7
Active Period
2018–2026
Registrant-reported income from clients on LDA filings
Largest clients by registrant-reported income
Government entities explicitly identified as targets in LDA filings
Most frequently reported lobbying issues
Bill numbers found in source-reported LDA specific issue text; broad topic matches are excluded
Cherokee Nation and Chickasaw Nation Criminal Jurisdiction Compacting Act of 2021
2022 · fourth_quarter · Client: UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA
Potential implications of legislation in response to McGirt Supreme Court decision, including HR 3091. Reservation jurisdiction issues. Congressional delegate seating issues.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $130,000
Matched citations: HR 3091
Cherokee Nation and Chickasaw Nation Criminal Jurisdiction Compacting Act of 2021
2022 · third_quarter · Client: UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA
Potential implications of legislation in response to McGirt Supreme Court decision, including HR 3091. Reservation jurisdiction issues.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: HR 3091
Cherokee Nation and Chickasaw Nation Criminal Jurisdiction Compacting Act of 2021
2022 · third_quarter · Client: UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA
Potential implications of legislation in response to McGirt Supreme Court decision, including HR 3091. Reservation jurisdiction issues.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: HR 3091
Cherokee Nation and Chickasaw Nation Criminal Jurisdiction Compacting Act of 2021
2022 · second_quarter · Client: UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA
Potential implications of legislation in response to McGirt Supreme Court decision, including HR 3091. Reservation jurisdiction issues.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: HR 3091
Cherokee Nation and Chickasaw Nation Criminal Jurisdiction Compacting Act of 2021
2022 · first_quarter · Client: UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA
Potential implications of legislation in response to McGirt Supreme Court decision, including HR 3091.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: HR 3091
Cherokee Nation and Chickasaw Nation Criminal Jurisdiction Compacting Act of 2021
2021 · fourth_quarter · Client: UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA
Potential implications of legislation in response to McGirt Supreme Court decision, including HR 3091.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: HR 3091
Cherokee Nation and Chickasaw Nation Criminal Jurisdiction Compacting Act of 2021
2021 · third_quarter · Client: UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA
Potential implications of legislation in response to McGirt Supreme Court decision, including HR 3091.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: HR 3091
Cherokee Nation and Chickasaw Nation Criminal Jurisdiction Compacting Act of 2021
2021 · second_quarter · Client: UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA
Potential implications of legislation in response to McGirt Supreme Court decision, including HR 3091.
Client expense: — · Firm income: $40,000
Matched citations: HR 3091
To repeal the eighth proviso under Operation of Indian Programs of 1998 to restore Tribal sovereignty.
2020 · fourth_quarter · Client: UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA
Issues regarding tribal jurisdiction under the McGirt case; defense against legislation to deprive Keetoowah of its vested right to hold lands in trust (H.R.7263 - To repeal the eighth proviso under Operation of Indian Programs of 1998 to restore Tribal sovereignty).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $30,000
Matched citations: H.R.7263
To repeal the eighth proviso under Operation of Indian Programs of 1998 to restore Tribal sovereignty.
2020 · third_quarter · Client: UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA
Issues regarding tribal jurisdiction anticipated once the Supreme Court decides the McGirt case; defense against legislation to deprive Keetoowah of its vested right to hold lands in trust (H.R.7263 - To repeal the eighth proviso under Operation of Indian Programs of 1998 to restore Tribal sovereignty).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: H.R.7263
To repeal the eighth proviso under Operation of Indian Programs of 1998 to restore Tribal sovereignty.
2020 · second_quarter · Client: UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA
Issues regarding tribal jurisdiction anticipated once the Supreme Court decides the McGirt case; defense against legislation to deprive Keetoowah of its vested right to hold lands in trust (H.R.7263 - To repeal the eighth proviso under Operation of Indian Programs of 1998 to restore Tribal sovereignty).
Client expense: — · Firm income: $20,000
Matched citations: H.R.7263
To repeal the eighth proviso under Operation of Indian Programs of 1998 to restore Tribal sovereignty.
2020 · second_quarter · Client: UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS IN OKLAHOMA
Protection of tribal sovereignty; opposition to H.R. 7263
Client expense: — · Firm income: —
Matched citations: H.R. 7263
Source: Senate LDA