Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021

Issues related to sugar policy and the sugar industry. HR 842 and S 420 for Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO Act).

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $15,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

NLRB Joint Employer Regulations; DOL Independent Contractor Regulations; OSHA Walkaround Rule; DOL Overtime Rule; NLRB Election Procedures Rule; H.R. 842 and S. 420, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act; H.R. 3400, the Small Businesses Before Bureaucrats Act; H.J. Res.98 and S.J. Res 49 Providing for congressional disapproval of the rule relating to Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status; S. 4260 and H.R. 8639, the Warehouse Worker Protection Act; H.J.Res.147; Providing for congressional disapproval relating to Worker Walkaround Representative Designation Process; Reforms to the Workforce Opportunity and Investment Act; NLRB Nominations; AI Tools in the Workplace

Client expense: $2,265,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Labor, Dept of (DOL), SENATE

GIG Act (H.R.781), Issues related to the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act (H.R.842/S.420). Employee Rights Act (H.R. 2700). Executive Branch Nominations. Issues related to Department of Labor oversight. Issues related to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration oversight. Issues related to independent contractors. Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the Labor relating to "Employee or Independent Contractor Classification Under the Fair Labor Standards Act". (H.J.Res.116). A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to "Employee or Independent Contractor Classification Under the Fair Labor Standards Act" (S.J.Res.63). Warehouse Worker Protection Act (S.4260). Warehouse Worker Protection Act (H.R.8639). Issues related to warehouse inspections.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

DOL Joint Employer Regulations DOL Independent Contractor Regulations; H.R. 842 and S. 420, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act.

Client expense: $240,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (PL 117-2), issues related to unemployment benefits and payments to aircraft parts manufacturers; Issues regarding H.R. 842/S.420 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021.

Client expense: $310,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE, White House Office

GIG Act (H.R.781), Issues related to the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act (H.R.842/S.420). Employee Rights Act (H.R. 2700). Executive Branch Nominations. Issues related to Department of Labor oversight. Issues related to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration oversight. Issues related to independent contractors. Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the Labor relating to "Employee or Independent Contractor Classification Under the Fair Labor Standards Act". (H.J.Res.116). A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to "Employee or Independent Contractor Classification Under the Fair Labor Standards Act" (S.J.Res.63). Warehouse Worker Protection Act (S.4260). Warehouse Worker Protection Act (H.R.8639). Issues related to warehouse inspections.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Issues related to sugar policy and the sugar industry. HR 842 and S 420 for Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO Act).

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $15,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

NLRB Joint Employer Regulations; DOL Independent Contractor Regulations; OSHA Walkaround Rule; DOL Overtime Rule; NLRB Election Procedures Rule; H.R. 842 and S. 420, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act; H.R. 3400, the Small Businesses Before Bureaucrats Act; H.J. Res.98 and S.J. Res 49 Providing for congressional disapproval of the rule relating to Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status; S. 4260 and H.R. 8639, the Warehouse Worker Protection Act; H.J.Res.147 Providing for congressional disapproval relating to Worker Walkaround Representative Designation Process; Reforms to the Workforce Opportunity and Investment Act

Client expense: $1,860,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Labor, Dept of (DOL), SENATE

DOL Joint Employer Regulations DOL Independent Contractor Regulations; H.R. 842 and S. 420, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act.

Client expense: $180,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (PL 117-2), issues related to unemployment benefits and payments to aircraft parts manufacturers; Issues regarding H.R. 842/S.420 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021.

Client expense: $310,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE, White House Office

GIG Act (H.R.781), Issues related to the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act (H.R.842/S.420). Employee Rights Act (H.R. 2700). Executive Branch Nominations. Issues related to Department of Labor oversight. Issues related to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration oversight.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

NLRB Joint Employer Regulations; DOL Independent Contractor Regulations; OSHA Walkaround Rule; DOL Overtime Rule; NLRB Election Procedures Rule; H.R. 842 and S. 420, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act; H.R. 3400, the Small Businesses Before Bureaucrats Act; H.J. Res.98 and S.J. Res 49 Providing for congressional disapproval of the rule relating to Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status; Warehouse Worker Safety legislation

Client expense: $2,186,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Labor, Dept of (DOL), SENATE

Issues related to sugar policy and the sugar industry. HR 842 and S 420 for Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO Act).

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $15,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

DOL Joint Employer Regulations DOL Independent Contractor Regulations; H.R. 842 and S. 420, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act.

Client expense: $200,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (PL 117-2), issues related to unemployment benefits and payments to aircraft parts manufacturers; Issues regarding H.R. 842/S.420 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021.

Client expense: $370,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE, White House Office

GIG Act (H.R.781), Issues related to the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act (H.R.842/S.420). Employee Rights Act (H.R. 2700). Executive Branch Nominations. Issues related to Department of Labor oversight. Issues related to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration oversight.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

NLRB Joint Employer Regulations; DOL Joint Employer Regulations; DOL Independent Contractor Regulations; OSHA Walkaround Rule; DOL Overtime Rule; NLRB Election Procedures Rule; H.R. 842 and S. 420, the Protecting the Right to Organize ActH.R. 3400, the Small Businesses Before Bureaucrats Act; H.J. Res.98 and S.J. Res 49 Providing for congressional disapproval of the rule relating to "Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status".

Client expense: $2,150,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Labor, Dept of (DOL), SENATE

Issues related to sugar policy and the sugar industry. HR 842 and S 420 for Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO Act).

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $15,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (PL 117-2), issues related to unemployment benefits and payments to aircraft parts manufacturers; Issues regarding H.R. 842/S.420 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021.

Client expense: $300,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE, White House Office

DOL Joint Employer Regulations DOL Independent Contractor Regulations; H.R. 842 and S. 420, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act.

Client expense: $230,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Issues related to sugar policy and the sugar industry. HR 842 and S 420 for Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO Act).

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $15,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

NLRB Joint Employer Regulations; DOL Joint Employer Regulations; DOL Independent Contractor Regulations; OSHA Walkaround Rule; DOL Overtime Rule; NLRB Election Procedures Rule; H.R. 842 and S. 420, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act; H.R. 7, Paycheck Fairness Act; H.R. 963 Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act

Client expense: $2,130,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Labor, Dept of (DOL), SENATE

GIG Act (H.R.781), Issues related to the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act (H.R.842/S.420). Employee Rights Act (H.R. 2700). Executive Branch Nominations. Issues related to Department of Labor oversight. Issues related to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration oversight.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

DOL Joint Employer Regulations DOL Independent Contractor Regulations; H.R. 842 and S. 420, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act.

Client expense: $150,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (PL 117-2), issues related to unemployment benefits and payments to aircraft parts manufacturers; Issues regarding H.R. 842/S.420 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021.

Client expense: $300,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE, White House Office

Issues related to sugar policy and the sugar industry. HR 842 and S 420 for Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO Act).

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $15,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

GIG Act (H.R.781), Issues related to the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act (H.R.842/S.420). Employee Rights Act (H.R. 2700). Executive Branch Nominations. *David Marten only lobbied on U.S. House of Representatives.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Freedom to Compete Act Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout) FTC Rulemaking on Noncompete Agreements Heat Injury and Illness Prevention ANPRM Joint Employer Standard OSHA Worker Walkaround Representation Designation Process Rulemaking Overtime Rulemaking Right to Repair S. 420, H.R. 2474, Protecting the Right to Organize Act Workforce Mobility Act Workplace Safety Issues

Client expense: $3,140,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: Centers For Disease Control & Prevention (CDC), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

NLRB Joint Employer Regulations; NLRB Independent Contractor Regulations; DOL Joint Employer Regulations; DOL Independent Contractor Regulations; H.R. 842 and S. 420, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act; H.R. 7, Paycheck Fairness Act; H.R.1065, Pregnant Workers Fairness Act; H.R. 963 Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act

Client expense: $2,150,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Labor, Dept of (DOL), SENATE

GIG Act (H.R.781), Issues related to the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act (H.R.842/S.420). *David Marten only lobbied on U.S. House of Representatives.

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $50,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Issues related to sugar policy and the sugar industry. HR 842 and S 420 for Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO Act).

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: $15,000

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Issues related to US workforce training proposals including proposals related to reducing recidivism; Issues related to COVID-19 workforce safety, essential industry workers.HR 842 and S 420 for Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO Act).

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Issues related to nonimmigrant visas, including implementation, cap relief, and needed reforms; Issues related to nonimmigrant visa program proposals for low skilled industries like construction; E-verify improvements. HR 842 and S 420 for Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO Act).

Client expense: Not reported · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Freedom to Compete Act Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout) FTC Rulemaking on Noncompete Agreements Heat Injury and Illness Prevention ANPRM Independent Contractor Rulemaking Joint Employer Standard Right to Repair S. 420, H.R. 2474, Protecting the Right to Organize Act Workforce Mobility Act Workplace Safety Issues

Client expense: $2,170,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: Federal Trade Commission (FTC), HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE, Small Business Administration (SBA)

Issues related to the future of work; Issues related to expanding options for portable benefits for independent contractors; Issues related to workforce classification; Labor rules impacting independent contractors; H.R. 842/S. 420 - The PRO Act (117th Congress), all provisions; Labor provisions in Build Back Better Act/Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (PL 117-169).

Client expense: $410,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: Energy, Dept of, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Labor, Dept of (DOL), SENATE

Definition of independent contractor; Multi-employer Pension Reform; H.R.1319 - American Rescue Plan Act of 2021; H.R.1284/S.403 - FOCA Act; Paid Leave, Family Medical Leave; Joint Employer; H.R.447 - National Apprenticeship Act of 2021; H.R.2037/S.864 - To extend Federal Pell Grant eligibility of certain short-term programs; S.589 - Chris Allen Multiemployer Pension Recapitalization and Reform Act of 2021; H.R.842/S.420 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021; H.R.602/S.200 - Relaunching Americas Workforce Act; American Jobs Plan; S.1298 - Clean Energy for America Act; H.R.3684 - INVEST in America Act; H.R.3473/S.1827 - Build Local, Hire Local Act; H.R.5376 - Build Back Better Act; H.R.3684 -(as amended)- Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act; H.R.4521 - America COMPETES Act of 2022; S.3889 - Employee Rights Act; H.R.5376, Inflation Reduction Act of 2022

Client expense: $261,261 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: Education, Dept of, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Health & Human Services, Dept of (HHS), Labor, Dept of (DOL), Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA), SENATE

NACD advocated in favor of the House, Senate, and joint resolutions to avoid a rail labor strike that passed both Chambers. Specifically, advocated in support of 1) H.J.Res.100 that provides for a resolution with respect to the unresolved disputes between certain railroads represented by the National Carriers' Conference Committee of the National Railway Labor Conference and certain of their employees, and S.J.Res.61 a joint resolution requires the parties to the disputes between certain railroads and labor organizations to accept the recommendations in the report of the Presidential Emergency Board Numbered 250 that was issued on August 16, 2022, with respect to any such disputes that remain unresolved by 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on September 16, 2022. Additionally, NACD advocated for a separate amendment to the resolution, H.Con.Res.119, which would grant workers seven paid sick days. Specifically, it was a concurrent resolution that would provide for seven days of sick leave for railroad employees under the terms of the most recent tentative agreements, side letters, and local carrier agreements entered into by the parties to the disputes between certain railroads and labor organizations. The resolution that guaranteed seven paid sick days for rail workers, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives, could not overcome the filibuster in the U.S. Senate despite receiving bipartisan support. Additionally, NACD advocated regarding NACDs support for including additional paid sick days in any legislated rail labor agreement. NACD advocates in opposition to the companion legislation S.420/H.R.842 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021. The PRO Act passed the House in March of this year but has not moved forward in the Senate. Provisions in the PRO Act would force employers to provide their employees' personal information to labor groups without employee consent, infringe upon a worker's right to a secret ballot in union elections, and take away a worker's ability to work independently, especially in those working in the gig economy. NACD advocated against the inclusion of elements of the PRO Act in several pieces of legislation. Legislation that serves, as a solution to the Multiemployer Pension Solvency Crisis, creating a new administration within the Treasury Department to issue loans to plans with (a) critical and declining, (b) critical, or (c) insolvent status. While generally supporting an immediate resolution of the crisis as well as moving the debate to the Senate, NACD is in opposition to bills that do not address underlying structural issues impacting Multi-employer pensions. Legislation that would bring the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) into the 21st century by updating the definition of employee, conforming the definition of employee with other New Deal era statutes that already apply a common-law definition for the term, and reconciling the FLSA with more recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions. Legislation that would (a) force companies to turn over personally identifying information such as addresses, contact information, and shift information on employees to unions, (b) shorten the amount of time businesses would have to prepare for union certifying elections (c) modify the tests for independent-contractor and joint-employer to definitions not consistent with current employment trends, and make many other changes to labor and employment law that would be better debated individually. NACD is in opposition to this bill.

Client expense: $40,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

NACD advocates in opposition to the companion legislation S.420/H.R.842 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021. The PRO Act passed the House in March of this year but has not moved forward in the Senate. Provisions in the PRO Act would force employers to provide their employees' personal information to labor groups without employee consent, infringe upon a worker's right to a secret ballot in union elections, and take away a worker's ability to work independently, especially in those working in the gig economy. NACD advocated against the inclusion of elements of the PRO Act in several pieces of legislation. Legislation that serves, as a solution to the Multiemployer Pension Solvency Crisis, creating a new administration within the Treasury Department to issue loans to plans with (a) critical and declining, (b) critical, or (c) insolvent status. While generally supporting an immediate resolution of the crisis as well as moving the debate to the Senate, NACD is in opposition to bills that do not address underlying structural issues impacting Multi-employer pensions. Legislation that would bring the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) into the 21st century by updating the definition of employee, conforming the definition of employee with other New Deal era statutes that already apply a common-law definition for the term, and reconciling the FLSA with more recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions. Legislation that would (a) force companies to turn over personally identifying information such as addresses, contact information, and shift information on employees to unions, (b) shorten the amount of time businesses would have to prepare for union certifying elections (c) modify the tests for independent-contractor and joint-employer to definitions not consistent with current employment trends, and make many other changes to labor and employment law that would be better debated individually. NACD is in opposition to this bill.

Client expense: $40,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

Oppose S 420 and HR 842, the Pro Act.

Client expense: $30,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

H.R.842 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021 S.420 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021

Client expense: $230,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

H.R.842 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021 S.420 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021

Client expense: $190,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

H.R.842 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021 S.420 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021

Client expense: $190,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

H.R.842 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021 S.420 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021

Client expense: $230,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE

H.R.842 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021 S.420 - Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021

Client expense: $950,000 · Firm income: Not reported

Government targets: HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SENATE